Additional file 1 of Uterine infusion strategies for infertile patients with recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
收藏DataCite Commons2024-08-15 更新2024-08-19 收录
下载链接:
https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Additional_file_1_of_Uterine_infusion_strategies_for_infertile_patients_with_recurrent_implantation_failure_a_systematic_review_and_network_meta-analysis/26707334
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Risk of bias assessment. a. Risk of bias summary; b. Risk of bias graph. Figure S2. Forest plot of the live birth in direct pair-wise meta-analysis. Figure S3. Network plots of eligible comparisons for secondary outcomes: clinical pregnancy rate. a. Live birth; b. Embryo implantation; c. Chemical pregnancy; d. Miscarriage. Figure S4. Forest plot of the embryo implantation in direct pair-wise meta-analysis. Figure S5. Forest plot of the chemical pregnancy in direct pair-wise meta-analysis. Figure S6. Forest plot of the miscarriage in direct pair-wise meta-analysis. Figure S7. Funnel plot of the pregnancy outcomes. Figure S8. Subgroup analysis of forest plot of the clinical pregnancy in the direct pair-wise meta-analysis by English researches. Figure S9. Subgroup analysis of forest plot of the clinical pregnancy in the direct pair-wise meta-analysis by Chinese researches. Supplemental Table S1. Characteristics of studies included in meta-analyses. Supplemental Table S2. Risk of bias assessment of the other prospective studies. Supplemental Table S3. Network meta-analysis for live birth comparing diverse uterine infusion strategies. Supplemental Table S4. Network meta-analysis for implantation comparing diverse uterine infusion strategies. Supplemental Table S5. Network meta-analysis for chemical pregnancy comparing diverse uterine infusion strategies. Supplemental Table S6. Network meta-analysis for miscarriage comparing diverse uterine infusion strategies. Supplemental Table S7. Subgroup analysis of network meta-analysis for clinical pregnancy by English researches. Supplemental Table S8. Subgroup analysis of network meta-analysis for clinical pregnancy by Chinese researches.
附加文件1:图S1:偏倚风险评估。a. 偏倚风险汇总图;b. 偏倚风险分布图。
图S2:直接配对Meta分析中活产率的森林图。
图S3:次要结局的合格比较网络图:临床妊娠率。a. 活产率;b. 胚胎着床率;c. 生化妊娠;d. 流产。
图S4:直接配对Meta分析中胚胎着床率的森林图。
图S5:直接配对Meta分析中生化妊娠的森林图。
图S6:直接配对Meta分析中流产的森林图。
图S7:妊娠结局的漏斗图。
图S8:基于英文研究分组的直接配对Meta分析临床妊娠率森林图的亚组分析。
图S9:基于中文研究分组的直接配对Meta分析临床妊娠率森林图的亚组分析。
补充表S1:Meta分析纳入研究的基本特征。
补充表S2:其他前瞻性研究的偏倚风险评估。
补充表S3:不同宫腔灌注策略的活产率网络Meta分析。
补充表S4:不同宫腔灌注策略的胚胎着床率网络Meta分析。
补充表S5:不同宫腔灌注策略的生化妊娠网络Meta分析。
补充表S6:不同宫腔灌注策略的流产网络Meta分析。
补充表S7:基于英文研究分组的临床妊娠率网络Meta分析亚组分析。
补充表S8:基于中文研究分组的临床妊娠率网络Meta分析亚组分析。
提供机构:
figshare
创建时间:
2024-08-15



