IFLA World Report 2010 (Analysis and Conclusions)

In this report, the findings of 2010 research are analysed and comparisons are made with the 2007 Report, where possible. The previous Reports in this series were branded as the IFLA/FAIFE World Report since the emphasis was primarily on FAIFE-related issues. At the request of IFLA Headquarters (HQ) the questionnaire was expanded considerably, as explained below, to include non-FAIFE-related issues. IFLA HQ therefore decided that the Report should be rebranded as the IFLA World Report. The current Report nevertheless still has a strong focus on FAIFE-related issues. Data collection for the World Report 2010 started in April 2009 and continued until the end of 2009, with a number of countries asking for extension into 2010. Data for the individual country reports therefore to a very large extent reflect the situation as in 2009. Therefore, in the comparative tables, the 2009 date was kept since this is the more accurate date for the data from most countries.

本报告对2010年相关研究的结论进行了分析，并在可行范围内与2007年报告开展对比。该系列此前的报告均以“国际图书馆协会联合会（IFLA）/自由获取信息与表达自由小组委员会（FAIFE）世界报告”冠名，因当时研究重点主要围绕FAIFE相关议题展开。应IFLA总部（HQ）的要求，调查问卷大幅扩容，如下文所述，新增了非FAIFE相关的议题。因此IFLA总部决定将本系列报告更名为“IFLA世界报告”。尽管如此，本报告仍重点聚焦FAIFE相关议题。2010年世界报告的数据收集工作始于2009年4月，持续至2009年末，期间有多个国家申请将数据收集周期延长至2010年。因此各国家报告的相关数据在极大程度上反映的是2009年的实际情况。故而在对比表格中，我们保留了2009年的时间标注，这一日期对多数国家的调研数据而言更为准确。