NON-ANESTHESIOLOGIST ADMINISTERED PROPOFOL SEDATION IN SCREENING COLONOSCOPY

These data came from a. prospective cohort study about cardiorespiratory complications in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy, comparing two sedation schemes: traditional sedation with fentanyl and midazolam, versus combined Propofol sedation administered by non-anesthesiologists. These screening colonoscopies were performed between 2018 and 2019. We used the ASA and Ramsay scales to evaluate comorbidities and sedation levels. Cardiopulmonary adverse events were defined as: systolic blood pressure<90 mmHg, oxygen saturation <90% or disrrythmia lasting for more than 60 seconds..We recorded the management and outcomes of all these unplanned events. Other data as age, gender and body mass index were recorded as well., We have stored our data as a csv fyle.

本数据集来源于一项针对结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查中心肺并发症的前瞻性队列研究，旨在对比两种镇静方案：其一为采用芬太尼与咪达唑仑的传统镇静方案，其二为非麻醉医师实施的丙泊酚联合镇静方案。本次筛查结肠镜检查操作均开展于2018年至2019年期间。本研究采用美国麻醉医师协会（ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists）评分与拉姆齐（Ramsay）镇静评分量表，分别评估受试者的合并症状况与镇静水平。心肺不良事件的判定标准为：收缩压<90mmHg、血氧饱和度<90%，或持续时长超过60秒的心律失常。本研究对所有非计划事件的处置措施与结局均进行了完整记录，同时收集了受试者的年龄、性别与体质量指数（Body Mass Index, BMI）等其他相关数据。本数据集以逗号分隔值（CSV, Comma-Separated Values）格式存储。