Raw Data for the article: Post-crisis debriefing: A tool for improving quality in the medical emergency team system

<strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine clinicians' perception of quality of technical and non-technical response to emergencies and application of post crisis debriefing. <strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive, anonymous, self-reporting survey on the needs and perception of a post-crisis debriefing implementation. <strong>Setting: </strong>Multi-specialist medical institute in Italy focused on solid organ transplantation and organ failure support. <strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Perception of application of guidelines and evaluation of debriefing implementation during in-hospital emergencies. <strong>Results: </strong>Response rate to the survey was 25% (148 health care workers). Of all respondents, 86% were employed &gt;10 years, 75% were involved in ≤5 emergencies over the previous year. Resuscitation guidelines were considered fully applied by 55%; 64% of respondents considered the teaching programme as sufficient. Of all participants, 97% were aware of the importance of teamwork dynamics, 79% were aware of the importance of the personal performance, and 52% considered emergencies as valid opportunities for professional growth. Leadership was considered important by 45% of respondents; debriefing implemented by 41%, and considered a potentially useful tool by 85%. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-crisis debriefing is a way to diffuse self-reflective and life-long learning culture; it is perceived as a powerful tool for improving quality of the rapid response system by the vast majority of those surveyed. <strong>Keywords: </strong>Communication; Crisis resource management; Emergency; ICU; Intensive care medicine; Leadership; Patient safety; Teamwork.**研究目标：** 旨在探讨临床医师对急诊场景下技术与非技术应急响应质量的认知，以及危机后复盘（Post-Crisis Debriefing）的应用情况。 **研究设计：** 针对危机后复盘实施的需求与认知，开展描述性、匿名自报式问卷调查。 **研究场景：** 意大利一家专注于实体器官移植（Solid Organ Transplantation）与器官衰竭支持治疗的多专科医学中心。 **主要结局指标：** 院内急诊期间临床指南应用的认知情况，以及危机后复盘实施的评估结果。 **研究结果：** 本次问卷调查有效回收率为25%，共纳入148名医疗工作者。其中86%的受访者从业年限超过10年，75%在既往1年内参与过不超过5次急诊处置。55%的受访者认为复苏指南（Resuscitation Guidelines）得到了完全落实；64%的受访者认为现有培训项目设置较为完善。97%的参与者认可团队协作机制的重要性，79%意识到个人执业表现的价值，52%认为急诊场景是专业成长的有效契机。45%的受访者认为领导力至关重要；仅41%的受访者所在机构实施了危机后复盘，而85%的受访者认为该工具具备潜在应用价值。 **研究结论：** 危机后复盘是传播自我反思与终身学习文化的有效路径；绝大多数受访者认为，该工具可显著提升快速响应系统的服务质量。 **关键词：** 沟通；危机资源管理（Crisis Resource Management）；急诊；重症监护病房（Intensive Care Unit, ICU）；重症医学；领导力；患者安全；团队协作。