Comparison tables for evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data

RO-Crate and tables from the paper "Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems" https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.07436

We systematically evaluate FDO and its implementations as a global distributed object system, by using five different conceptual frameworks that cover interoperability, middleware, FAIR principles, EOSC requirements and FDO guidelines themself.

table1.html
Considering FDO and Web according to the quality levels of the Interoperability Framework for Fast Data (Delgado 2016)

table2.html
Mapping the Metamodel concepts from the Interoperability Framework for Fast Data (Delgado 2016) to equivalent concepts for FDO and Web.

table3.html
Checking FDO guidelines (Bonino et al. 2019; Anders et al. 2023) against its current implementations as DOIP (DONA 2018) and Linked Data Platform (LDP) (Bonino da Silva Santos, Guizzardi, and Sales 2022), with suggestions for required additions

table4.html
Comparing FAIR Digital Object (with the DOIP 2.0 protocol (DONA 2018)) and Web technologies (using Linked Data) as middleware infrastructures (Zarras 2004)

table5.html

Assessing RDA’s FAIR Data Maturity Model (FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group 2020; Bahim et al. 2020) (first 2 columns) against the FDO guidelines (Bonino et al. 2019), FDO implemented with the protocol DOIPv2 (DONA 2018), Linked Data Platform (LDP) (Bonino da Silva Santos, Guizzardi, and Sales 2022) and examples from Linked Data practices in general. (— indicates Unspecified, may be possible with additional conventions)

A web rendering of this RO-Crate is available at https://w3id.org/ro/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8075229

本数据集包含来自论文《Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems》（DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.07436）的RO-Crate（研究对象套件，Research Object Crate）与相关表格。

本研究采用五大不同概念框架，系统性评估FAIR数字对象（FAIR Digital Object，FDO）及其实现作为全球分布式对象系统的性能，这些框架覆盖互操作性、中间件、FAIR原则、欧洲开放科学云（European Open Science Cloud, EOSC）需求以及FDO自身指南。

- table1.html：基于《快速数据互操作性框架》（Delgado 2016）的质量等级，针对FDO与Web开展的分析
- table2.html：将《快速数据互操作性框架》（Delgado 2016）中的元模型概念映射至FDO与Web的等价概念
- table3.html：以数字对象交互协议（Digital Object Interface Protocol, DOIP，DONA 2018）与关联数据平台（Linked Data Platform, LDP）（Bonino da Silva Santos、Guizzardi及Sales 2022）的现有实现为参照，对照FDO指南（Bonino et al. 2019; Anders et al. 2023）并提出必要增补建议
- table4.html：将FAIR数字对象（采用DOIP 2.0协议（DONA 2018））与采用关联数据的Web技术作为中间件基础设施进行对比（Zarras 2004）
- table5.html：将研究数据联盟（Research Data Alliance, RDA）的FAIR数据成熟度模型（FAIR Data Maturity Model）（FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group 2020; Bahim et al. 2020）（前两列）与FDO指南（Bonino et al. 2019）、采用DOIPv2协议（DONA 2018）实现的FDO、关联数据平台（LDP）（Bonino da Silva Santos、Guizzardi及Sales 2022）以及通用关联数据实践案例进行对照评估（“—”表示未指定，可通过额外约定实现）

该RO-Crate的网页渲染版本可通过以下链接获取：https://w3id.org/ro/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8075229