Data and code related to the publication: "Past peak prominence: The changing role of integrated assessment modeling in the IPCC"

We created this dataset and scripts with the research aim to analyze the influence of Integrated Assessment Modelling (IAM) research on Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) reports. We analyzed the following research questions (Table 1):1.    Which IAM researchers have been cited in IPCC WG3 reports?2.    To what extent are IPCC WG3 reports based on IAM research?2.1. What share of IPCC WG3 references are authored by any IAM researcher individually?2.2. How much of the evidence base of IPCC WG3 reports is IAM research?2.2.1.    What share of IPCC WG3 references are authored by all IAM researchers together?2.2.2.    How sensitive are the results to different sample sizes of IAM researchers?2.3. How many IAM researchers are responsible for the majority of IAM research in IPCC reports?2.4. What share of IPCC WG3 references in each chapter are authored by IAM researchers?3.    To what extent are IPCC WG3 SPM statements based on IAM research?4.    How diverse is the sample of IAM research covered in IPCC WG3 reports?<br>RQs that can be answered using the same dataset:·     Who are the most cited researchers by IPCC WG3 reports? (Section 1)·     Which chapters act as knowledge bridges in IPCC reports? Which chapters are most commonly co-cited in the SPM? Which chapters are not well covered in the SPM? (Section 3)·     What share of evidence in IPCC WG3 reports is attributable to the top 30 most cited researchers? (Section 1 &amp; 2.3)·     What is the distribution of affiliated institutes for IAM researchers who have been cited in IPCC WG3 reports? (Section 4) RQs that can be answered by modifying the script/files:·     Who are the most cited researchers in other reports (e.g. UNEP reports)? (Section 1)·     To what extent has research from another research field (e.g. nuclear energy research) been cited in IPCC WG3 reports? (Section 2.1, 2.2 &amp; 2.4)·     To what extent has IAM research been covered in other reports (e.g. UNEP reports)? (Section 2.1, 2.2 &amp; 2.4)·     How diverse is the IAM research covered in IPCC WG3 reports regarding ethnicity and academic experience level? (Section 4)<br>Check the documentation file for more details.

本研究团队为分析综合评估模型（Integrated Assessment Modelling, IAM）研究对政府间气候变化专门委员会（Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC）报告的影响，构建了本数据集与配套脚本。本次分析围绕以下研究问题展开（详见表1）：
1. 哪些综合评估模型研究者被IPCC第三工作组（WG3）报告所引用？
2. IPCC第三工作组报告的研究基础在多大程度上依托综合评估模型研究？
2.1 由任意单一综合评估模型研究者作为作者的IPCC第三工作组参考文献占比为多少？
2.2 IPCC第三工作组报告的证据体系中，综合评估模型研究占比几何？
2.2.1 全部综合评估模型研究者作为共同作者的IPCC第三工作组参考文献占比为多少？
2.2.2 研究结果对综合评估模型研究者的不同样本规模敏感度如何？
2.3 主导IPCC报告中绝大多数综合评估模型研究的研究者共有多少位？
2.4 IPCC第三工作组各章节中，由综合评估模型研究者作为作者的参考文献占比为多少？
3. IPCC第三工作组政策制定者摘要（Summary for Policymakers, SPM）中的表述在多大程度上依托综合评估模型研究？
4. IPCC第三工作组报告所覆盖的综合评估模型研究样本多样性如何？

可通过本数据集直接解答的研究问题：
· 被IPCC第三工作组报告引用频次最高的研究者有哪些？（对应第1部分）
· 哪些章节在IPCC报告中承担知识桥梁作用？政策制定者摘要中最常被共同引用的章节有哪些？政策制定者摘要对哪些章节覆盖不足？（对应第3部分）
· IPCC第三工作组报告的证据体系中，被引次数前30的研究者贡献了多少占比？（对应第1、2.3部分）
· 被IPCC第三工作组报告引用的综合评估模型研究者的所属机构分布情况如何？（对应第4部分）

可通过修改脚本或文件实现解答的研究问题：
· 其他报告（如联合国环境规划署（United Nations Environment Programme, UNEP）报告）中被引频次最高的研究者有哪些？（对应第1部分）
· 其他研究领域（如核能研究）的成果在IPCC第三工作组报告中的被引情况如何？（对应2.1、2.2及2.4部分）
· 综合评估模型研究在其他报告（如联合国环境规划署报告）中的覆盖程度如何？（对应2.1、2.2及2.4部分）
· 从种族与学术经历层级维度来看，IPCC第三工作组报告所覆盖的综合评估模型研究样本多样性如何？（对应第4部分）

更多细节请查阅文档文件。