Complementation of a69 recombinant strains.

Recombinants described in Fig 3 were crossed to a69 and the number of ommatidia counted expressing Rh5 or Rh6, Total counted, and % Rh5 are indicated in the table. Controls for comparison were homozygous a69 mutants or a69 / w1118 heterozygotes. Each recombinant strain was compared to both controls (right two columns) and was either not significantly different (NSD) or significantly different from (SDF) the indicated control at the p value stated. Statistical comparisons of strains were carried out as described in Materials and Methods. Controls are indicated at the bottom of the table. Recombinant strains having % Rh5 values intermediate between wild type and mutant phenotypes, but statistically significantly different from both, are shaded. (XLSX)

将图3中描述的重组体与a69品系进行杂交，统计表达视紫红质5（Rh5）或视紫红质6（Rh6）的小眼数目、总计数结果以及视紫红质5占比（% Rh5），相关数据均列于表格内。本研究设置两类对照用于比对：纯合a69突变体与a69/w1118杂合子。每个重组品系均需与两种对照分别进行比较（对应表格最右侧两列），并根据标注的p值，判定该品系与对应对照无显著差异（NSD）或存在显著差异（SDF）。所有品系的统计学比较均按照《材料与方法》中所述方法完成。对照样本已在表格底部标注。部分重组品系的视紫红质5占比介于野生型与突变体表型之间，但与两种对照均存在统计学显著差异，此类品系已作阴影标注。（XLSX）