Supplemental Tables

Table titles are as follows:<br>Table S1. <i>S. cerevisiae</i> Met positive edgesTable S2. <i>A. thaliana</i> Met positive edgesTable S3. <i>H. sapiens</i> Met positive edgesTable S4. <i>S. cerevisiae</i> TF positive edgesTable S5. <i>A. thaliana</i> TF positive edgesTable S6. <i>H. sapiens</i> TF positive edgesTable S7. <i>S. cerevisiae</i> GO positive edgesTable S8. <i>A. thaliana</i> GO positive edgesTable S9. <i>H. sapiens</i> GO positive edgesTable 10. Pseudoalignment statistics of <i>S. cerevisiae</i> RNA-seq samplesTable S11. Pseudoalignment statistics of <i>A. thaliana</i> RNA-seq samplesTable S12. Pseudoalignment statistics of <i>H. sapiens</i> RNA-seq samplesTable S13. <i>S. cerevisiae</i> RNA-seq samples metadata and K-means clustering assignments at different partition granularitiesTable S14. <i>A. thaliana</i> RNA-seq samples metadata and K-means clustering assignments at different partition granularitiesTable S15. <i>H. sapiens</i> RNA-seq samples metadata and K-means clustering assignments at different partition granularitiesTable S16. Performance scores of <i>S. cerevisiae</i> non-ensemble PCC GCN, coexpressDB GCN and TEA-GCN across different biological aspectsTable S17. Performance scores of <i>A. thaliana</i> non-ensemble PCC GCN, ATTED-II GCN and TEA-GCN across different biological aspectsTable S18. Performance scores of <i>H. sapiens</i> non-ensemble PCC GCN, coexpressDB GCN and TEA-GCN across different biological aspectsTable S19. Comparison of Met positive edges standardized co-expression strengths from different pathway ontological classes between <i>A. thaliana</i> GCN and ATTED-II GCNTable S20. Performance scores of downsampled <i>A. thaliana</i> TEA-GCNsTable S21. <i>A. thaliana</i> GRN positive edgesTable S22. GRN-inference performance scores of downsampled <i>A.thaliana</i> TEA-GCNs and GENIE3 GRNsTable S23. Lemma annotations of 444 <i>A. thaliana</i> dataset partitionsTable S24. Partition rankings of deconvoluted <i>A. thaliana</i> edges of interestsTable S25. Experimental Contexts discovered for selected TF positive edgesTable S26. Enrichment statistics of experimental context lemmas of TF positive edges connecting <i>ABI5</i> and <i>MS188</i>

如下为表格标题：
表格S1. 酿酒酵母（S. cerevisiae）代谢（Met）正边
表格S2. 拟南芥（A. thaliana）代谢正边
表格S3. 智人（H. sapiens）代谢正边
表格S4. 酿酒酵母（S. cerevisiae）转录因子（Transcription Factor, TF）正边
表格S5. 拟南芥（A. thaliana）转录因子正边
表格S6. 智人（H. sapiens）转录因子正边
表格S7. 酿酒酵母（S. cerevisiae）基因本体（Gene Ontology, GO）正边
表格S8. 拟南芥（A. thaliana）基因本体正边
表格S9. 智人（H. sapiens）基因本体正边
表格10. 酿酒酵母（S. cerevisiae）RNA测序（RNA-seq）样本伪比对统计量
表格S11. 拟南芥（A. thaliana）RNA测序样本伪比对统计量
表格S12. 智人（H. sapiens）RNA测序样本伪比对统计量
表格S13. 酿酒酵母（S. cerevisiae）RNA测序样本元数据及不同划分粒度下的K均值聚类归属
表格S14. 拟南芥（A. thaliana）RNA测序样本元数据及不同划分粒度下的K均值聚类归属
表格S15. 智人（H. sapiens）RNA测序样本元数据及不同划分粒度下的K均值聚类归属
表格S16. 酿酒酵母（S. cerevisiae）非集成皮尔逊相关系数（Pearson Correlation Coefficient, PCC）图卷积网络（Graph Convolutional Network, GCN）、coexpressDB GCN及TEA-GCN在不同生物学维度下的性能得分
表格S17. 拟南芥（A. thaliana）非集成PCC GCN、ATTED-II GCN及TEA-GCN在不同生物学维度下的性能得分
表格S18. 智人（H. sapiens）非集成PCC GCN、coexpressDB GCN及TEA-GCN在不同生物学维度下的性能得分
表格S19. 拟南芥（A. thaliana）GCN与ATTED-II GCN间不同通路本体类别的代谢正边标准化共表达强度比较
表格S20. 下采样拟南芥（A. thaliana）TEA-GCN的性能得分
表格S21. 拟南芥（A. thaliana）基因调控网络（Gene Regulatory Network, GRN）正边
表格S22. 下采样拟南芥（A. thaliana）TEA-GCN与GENIE3 GRN的基因调控网络推断性能得分
表格S23. 444个拟南芥（A. thaliana）数据集划分的词元标注
表格S24. 解卷积得到的拟南芥（A. thaliana）目标边的划分排名
表格S25. 筛选得到的转录因子正边所对应的发现实验背景
表格S26. 连接ABI5与MS188的转录因子正边的实验背景词元富集统计量