Upwelling spectral radiance as measured in different depths at radiometer station PS75/299-3 (corrected version)

In the previous upwelling radiance (Lu) profile data set (doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.821193), Lu data were wrongly shifted by 3 nm (which responds to the originally resolution of the measurement). The results of the publications related to these data were not affected. Taylor et al. 2013 investigated only Lu data incorrectly shifted by 3 nm, so the analysis was consistent within itself. Bracher et al. 2015 used the remote sensing reflectance (RRS) data calculated from the incorrectly shifted Lu data. The resulting RRS data only showed inconsistencies were the incoming downwelling irradiance changes quickly with wavelengths, which resulted erroneous features <430 nm. We have used both versions (previous and the one presented here) Lu and RRS data and got the same results since the wrong features <430 nm are consistent and are not used for the pigment predictions (since these features are contained in the first empirical orthogonal function) in Bracher et al. 2015.

在先前的上行辐亮度（upwelling radiance, Lu）剖面数据集（doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.821193）中，Lu数据被错误偏移了3 nm（对应于测量的原始分辨率）。与此数据相关的出版物结果未受影响：Taylor等人2013年仅对偏移3 nm的错误Lu数据进行了研究，因此其分析内部保持一致；Bracher等人2015年使用了由错误偏移Lu数据计算得到的遥感反射率（remote sensing reflectance, RRS）数据，所得RRS数据仅在入射下行辐照度（downwelling irradiance）随波长快速变化时表现出不一致性，从而导致430 nm以下出现错误特征。我们使用了两个版本（先前版本与本文呈现的版本）的Lu和RRS数据，得到了一致结果——因430 nm以下的错误特征具有一致性，且在Bracher等人2015年的研究中未用于色素预测（这些特征包含于第一经验正交函数（empirical orthogonal function）中）。