five

Cost-effectiveness of the adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccine among adults aged ≥60 years in the United States

收藏
Figshare2024-12-10 更新2026-04-28 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Cost-effectiveness_of_the_adjuvanted_RSVPreF3_vaccine_among_adults_aged_60_years_in_the_United_States/27998416
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of acute respiratory illness in individuals of all ages, with adults aged ≥60 years and adults with certain chronic conditions at increased risk of severe RSV-related outcomes. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccine versus no vaccine in adults aged ≥60 years in the United States (US). A multi-cohort Markov model was developed with a 5-year time horizon and 1-month cycle length to compare outcomes for no vaccination and one-time adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination (assuming the same vaccination as for influenza vaccines). Clinical parameters (e.g., vaccine efficacy) were based on phase 3 clinical trial data over 3 seasons, with all other inputs obtained from public US sources and scientific literature. Outcomes included total and incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) losses and costs, as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the sensitivity of results to inputs. In the base case, the model estimated that vaccinating 52.7 million adults aged ≥60 years with the adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccine once would result in 244,424 fewer QALY losses and an incremental societal cost of $4.5 billion over 5 years, with vaccination costs partially offset by reduced disease-related costs. From the societal perspective, adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination resulted in an ICER of $18,430 per QALY gained. Results were relatively robust across sensitivity analyses and indicate that adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination is a cost-effective option for the prevention of RSV in US adults aged ≥ 60 years, reducing the substantial burden within this population.

呼吸道合胞病毒(Respiratory syncytial virus, RSV)是引发各年龄段人群罹患急性呼吸道疾病的常见病原体,其中60岁及以上成人以及伴有特定慢性疾病的成人,发生严重RSV相关不良结局的风险显著升高。本研究评估了佐剂化RSVPreF3疫苗与不接种疫苗,针对美国(US)60岁及以上成人的成本效益。研究构建了时间跨度为5年、周期时长为1个月的多队列马尔可夫(Markov)模型,对比不接种疫苗与一次性接种佐剂化RSVPreF3疫苗(假设其接种方案与流感疫苗一致)的临床结局。临床参数(如疫苗效力)基于覆盖3个流行季的3期临床试验数据,其余所有输入参数均取自美国公开数据源与科学文献。研究结局包括总质量调整生命年(quality-adjusted life year, QALY)损失与总成本、增量质量调整生命年损失与增量成本,以及增量成本效益比(incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, ICERs)。本研究开展了敏感性分析,以评估研究结果对输入参数的敏感性。在基准场景中,模型估算显示,为5270万60岁及以上成人接种一剂佐剂化RSVPreF3疫苗,可在5年内减少244424个质量调整生命年损失,同时带来45亿美元的增量社会总成本,疫苗接种成本可因疾病相关成本的降低而得到部分抵消。从社会视角来看,佐剂化RSVPreF3疫苗接种的增量成本效益比为18430美元每获得1个质量调整生命年。敏感性分析结果显示该结论相对稳健,表明佐剂化RSVPreF3疫苗接种是美国60岁及以上成人预防RSV感染的具有成本效益的方案,可显著减轻该人群所承受的沉重疾病负担。
创建时间:
2024-12-10
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务