TABLE 1. The top ten metadata standards more accessed during 2016.

The top ten standards more accessed during 2016. This rank, however, shows no direct correlation with their level of adoption (by journals and databases’ data policies, databases and repositories), and it probably reflects the activity of their community, in the case those in development, and their popularity within their direct domain.

2016年度访问量排名前十的标准。不过该排名与其实际采用率（依据期刊、数据库的数据政策以及数据库与仓储库的相关数据）并无直接关联；其排名大概率反映的是标准所属社区的活跃度（针对尚在开发中的标准而言），以及该标准在对应细分领域内的受欢迎程度。