Cinema, Truth, and Time: The Falsifier: Lecture 1, 08 November 1983
收藏DataCite Commons2024-10-23 更新2025-04-16 收录
下载链接:
https://purr.purdue.edu/publications/2757/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
<p><em>The Deleuze Seminars</em> is a collection of audio recordings, transcriptions, and English translations of, and supplemental materials from, the lectures French philosopher Gilles&nbsp;Deleuze gave during his career at the University of Paris 8.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Cinema, Truth, and Time: The Falsifier&rdquo; was a 22-lecture seminar given from November 1983 to June 1984. This seminar, the third of four consecutive seminars Deleuze gave on cinema, shifts focus from the movement-image to the time-image. In these lectures, Deleuze continues to elaborate his theory of cinema through various theoretical and aesthetic frames including: Ancient Greek philosophy; Nietzsche&rsquo;s reconsideration of the concept of truth; principles of formal logic; literature; the time-image as crystallization; and the filmmakers he thinks are particularly influential in creating the time-image. As a precursor to the publication of Deleuze&rsquo;s second of two volumes on cinema, <em>Cinema 2: The Time-Image</em> (<em>Cin&eacute;ma II. L&#39;image-temps</em>, 1985), this seminar is a valuable resource to researchers interested in Deleuze&rsquo;s film theory, as well as his larger philosophical oeuvre.</p>
<p>In session 1, 8 November 1983, Deleuze&rsquo;s introduction includes the theme, &quot;truth, time, and the falsifier&quot;, and the dual faceted approach, discussions of six texts and students&rsquo; own parallel research directions on Melville (<em>The Confidence Man</em>); Plato (specific dialogues); Nietzsche (<em>Twilight of the Idols </em>and <em>Beyond Good and Evil</em>); specific filmmakers &ldquo;of the false&rdquo; (e.g. Welles, Resnais, Robbe-Grillet); crystallography and its possible relations to philosophy; and the French New Novel. Deleuze asks three global questions: What is the strange relationship between the cinematographic image and time and the falsifier? Why is the falsifier a fundamental character from the cinema perspective? And what is the special relationship between cinema and the power of the false? Deleuze then reflects on the Classical distinction between true and false, noting that even if the false has no form, it does indeed have a power of action (<em>puissance</em>), defined as the indiscernibility of the real and the imaginary. Deleuze considers various facets of indiscernibility (cf. Robbe-Grillet &amp; Resnais&rsquo;s film &ldquo;Last Year at Marienbad&rdquo; and Robbe-Grillet&rsquo;s commentary on the film in <em>For a New Novel</em>), quickly introducing &ldquo;the falsifier&rdquo; as the &ldquo;ideal viewer&rdquo;, the one who constructs the indiscernibility of the real and the imaginary. Considering this &ldquo;concretion&rdquo; of real and imaginary (cf. Welles&rsquo;s &ldquo;The Lady from Shanghai&rdquo;), he proposes the obverse term to &ldquo;organic&rdquo; for the true, a &ldquo;crystalline formation&rdquo;. Finally, forecasting developments to come later in the seminar, Deleuze proposes that what one glimpses within the crystal is nothing other than aspects and accents of Time. [NB: See Chapter 6 of <em>The Time-Image</em>, &quot;The powers of the false,&quot; notably Melville, Nietzsche and Godard]</p>
<p>This dataset includes: the complete French transcription and English translation of the recorded lecture in Open Document Text (odt) format, the complete recording in mp3 format, and the original Paris 8 French transcript. [Please note: while the recordings on Paris 8 proceed correctly, in the proper order of the 2 parts, the session listed on WebDeleuze as the seminar&#39;s first session for Cinema III (dated there incorrectly as November 2, 1983) corresponds to the first session of the previous seminar, Cinema II (dated November 2, 1982)] [WebDeleuze was founded by Richard Pinhas -- a student in Deleuze&#39;s seminars -- who, with the Deleuze family&#39;s support, developed transcripts and translations of many of the seminars.]</p>
<p>--</p>
<p><em>Les S&eacute;minaires de Deleuze</em> sont une collection d&#39;enregistrements audio, de transcriptions et de traductions en anglais et de documents compl&eacute;mentaires des conf&eacute;rences que le philosophe fran&ccedil;ais Gilles Deleuze a donn&eacute; lors de sa carri&egrave;re &agrave; l&#39;Universit&eacute; de Paris 8.</p>
<p>&laquo;Cin&eacute;ma, v&eacute;rit&eacute; et temps: le faussaire&raquo; &eacute;tait un s&eacute;minaire de 22 conf&eacute;rences donn&eacute; de novembre 1983 &agrave; juin 1984. Ce s&eacute;minaire, le troisi&egrave;me des quatre s&eacute;minaires cons&eacute;cutifs que Deleuze a donn&eacute;s sur le cin&eacute;ma, met l&#39;accent sur l&rsquo;image-mouvement vers l&rsquo;image-temps. En tant que pr&eacute;curseur de la publication du deuxi&egrave;me de deux volumes de Deleuze sur le cin&eacute;ma, <em>Cin&eacute;ma II. L&#39;Image-temps</em> (1985), ce s&eacute;minaire est une ressource pr&eacute;cieuse pour les chercheurs int&eacute;ress&eacute;s par la th&eacute;orie du film de Deleuze, ainsi que sa plus grande &oelig;uvre philosophique.</p>
<p>Dans la premi&egrave;re s&eacute;ance, le 8 novembre 1983, Deleuze introduit le th&egrave;me &laquo; la v&eacute;rit&eacute;, le temps et le faussaire &raquo; et propose une approche &agrave; double facette, des discussions sur six textes et les recherches parall&egrave;les des &eacute;tudiants sur Melville ; Platon (dialogues sp&eacute;cifiques) ; Nietzsche (Le Cr&eacute;puscule des idoles et Au-del&agrave; du bien et du mal) ; des cin&eacute;astes sp&eacute;cifiques &laquo; du faux &raquo; (par exemple, Welles, Resnais, Robbe-Grillet) ; la cristallographie et ses relations possibles avec la philosophie ; et le Nouveau Roman fran&ccedil;ais. Apr&egrave;s avoir pos&eacute; trois questions globales, Deleuze consid&egrave;re diverses facettes de l&rsquo;indiscernabilit&eacute;, introduisant rapidement &laquo; le faussaire &raquo; comme le &laquo; spectateur id&eacute;al &raquo;. Enfin, pr&eacute;voyant les d&eacute;veloppements &agrave; venir plus tard dans le s&eacute;minaire, Deleuze propose que ce que l&rsquo;on entrevoit dans le cristal ne soit rien d&rsquo;autre que des aspects et des accents du Temps. [NB : Voir le chapitre 6 de <em>L&#39;Image-temps</em>]</p>
<p>《德勒兹研讨会》(The Deleuze Seminars)是法国哲学家吉尔·德勒兹在巴黎第八大学执教期间所授课程的音频录音、转录文本、英文译本及补充材料的合集。</p><p>《电影、真理与时间:伪造者》(Cinéma, vérité et temps: le faussaire)是1983年11月至1984年6月举办的包含22讲的研讨会。作为德勒兹连续四场电影主题研讨会中的第三场,它将焦点从运动-影像(movement-image)转向时间-影像(time-image)。在这些课程中,德勒兹通过古希腊哲学、尼采对真理概念的重新思考、形式逻辑原理、文学、作为结晶的时间-影像以及他认为对时间-影像创作具有重要影响的导演等多种理论与美学框架,继续阐述其电影理论。作为《电影II:时间-影像》(Cinema 2: The Time-Image,法语原版Cinéma II. L'image-temps,1985)的先导,该研讨会对研究德勒兹电影理论及其中哲学著作的学者而言是宝贵资源。</p><p>1983年11月8日的第一讲中,德勒兹引入“真理、时间与伪造者”这一主题,并提出双重视角的研究方法:围绕六部文本展开讨论,同时鼓励学生就梅尔维尔的《骗子》(The Confidence Man)、柏拉图的特定对话录、尼采的《偶像的黄昏》(Twilight of the Idols)与《善恶的彼岸》(Beyond Good and Evil)、特定“虚假”导演(如威尔斯、雷奈、罗伯-格里耶)、结晶学及其与哲学的可能关联、法国新小说等主题进行平行研究。德勒兹提出三个核心问题:电影影像与时间及伪造者之间存在何种奇特关联?为何伪造者是电影视角下的核心角色?电影与虚假的力量之间存在何种特殊联系?随后,他反思了古典哲学中真与假的区分,指出尽管虚假无固定形式,却具有行动的力量(puissance)——即真实与想象的不可区分性。德勒兹探讨了不可区分性的多个面向(参见罗伯-格里耶与雷奈的电影《去年在马里昂巴德》及罗伯-格里耶在《为了一种新小说》中的相关评论),随即引入“伪造者”作为“理想观众”的概念:即构建真实与想象不可区分性的主体。考虑到真实与想象的这种“具体化”(参见威尔斯的《上海小姐》),他提出与“有机”(对应真实)相对的概念——“晶体结构”。最后,他预告了研讨会后续将展开的内容,指出人们在晶体中窥见的无非是时间的不同面向与特质。[注:参见《时间-影像》第六章“虚假的力量”,尤其是关于梅尔维尔、尼采与戈达尔的部分]</p><p>本数据集包含:完整的法语转录文本及英文译本(Open Document Text格式,odt)、完整录音(mp3格式)及巴黎第八大学原版法语转录文本。[请注意:巴黎第八大学的录音顺序正确,分为两部分且顺序无误;但WebDeleuze上将电影III研讨会第一讲标注为1983年11月2日(日期错误),该内容实际对应上一场研讨会电影II的第一讲(日期为1982年11月2日)] [WebDeleuze由德勒兹研讨会的学生Richard Pinhas创立,他在德勒兹家族支持下完成了多部研讨会的转录与翻译工作]</p><p>——</p><p>《德勒兹研讨会》(Les Séminaires de Deleuze)是法国哲学家吉尔·德勒兹在巴黎第八大学执教期间所授课程的音频录音、转录文本、英文译本及补充材料的合集。</p><p>《电影、真理与时间:伪造者》(Cinéma, vérité et temps: le faussaire)是1983年11月至1984年6月举办的包含22讲的研讨会。作为德勒兹连续四场电影主题研讨会中的第三场,它将焦点从运动-影像转向时间-影像。作为《电影II:时间-影像》(Cinéma II. L'Image-temps,1985)的先导,该研讨会对研究德勒兹电影理论及其中哲学著作的学者而言是宝贵资源。</p><p>1983年11月8日的第一讲中,德勒兹引入“真理、时间与伪造者”这一主题,并提出双重视角的研究方法:围绕六部文本展开讨论,同时鼓励学生就梅尔维尔、柏拉图(特定对话录)、尼采的《偶像的黄昏》与《善恶的彼岸》、特定“虚假”导演(如威尔斯、雷奈、罗伯-格里耶)、结晶学及其与哲学的可能关联、法国新小说等主题进行平行研究。在提出三个核心问题后,德勒兹探讨了不可区分性的多个面向,随即引入“伪造者”作为“理想观众”的概念。最后,他预告了研讨会后续将展开的内容,指出人们在晶体中窥见的无非是时间的不同面向与特质。[注:参见《时间-影像》第六章]</p>
提供机构:
Purdue University Research Repository
创建时间:
2024-10-23



