Literature review of flow and work engagement interventions

The dataset includes an exhaustive search of the articles on flow
intervention across disciplines within
the PsychINFO and PsycArticles databases and seminal review papers (e.g.,
Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2009), and a selective search of the articles
on work engagement intervention from
recent systematic reviews (Knight
et al., 2019, Virga et al., 2019). The articles selected are all English-written
empirical research published in peer-reviewed journals up till October 2020
that study an intervention and include flow or work engagement as one outcome
measured with a validated measure. The
process has identified 47 articles on flow and 49 on work engagement. The articles were examined in
abstract and full text and were thematically coded with three major coding
themes: theory of change (i.e., the mechanism of why the
intervention works), intervention type (i.e., the key component featured
in the intervention), and approach (i.e., levels: personal vs.
contextual; and perspectives: deficit-fixing vs. strengths-building).

本数据集针对PsychINFO与PsycArticles两大数据库中各学科领域下的心流（flow）干预相关文献，以及Nakamura与Csikszentmihalyi于2009年发表的经典综述文献（如Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2009）开展了全面检索；同时针对近期发表的工作投入（work engagement）干预相关系统综述（Knight et al., 2019；Virga et al., 2019）中的相关文献进行了针对性检索。本次筛选纳入的文献均为2020年10月前发表于同行评议期刊的英文实证研究，且均围绕某项干预展开，并以心流或工作投入作为经信效度验证的测量结果之一。本次检索筛选共得到47篇与心流干预相关的文献，以及49篇与工作投入干预相关的文献。研究团队对筛选出的文献分别从摘要与全文两个维度进行研读，并基于三大核心主题开展主题编码：其一为变革理论（theory of change，即阐明干预生效的内在机制），其二为干预类型（即干预方案的核心构成要素），其三为研究路径（即干预层级：个人层面与情境层面；以及研究视角：缺陷修复取向与优势构建取向）。