A Replication Package for Contentious Patch Analysis

[SUMMARY]To enable future studies, we have made a replication package available here, which includes the quantitative and qualitative data, and more detailed hierarchies of the reasons for abandonment and integration of contentious patches (omitted in the paper due to space limitations).<br>[Quantitative Analysis (RQ1, RQ2, and RQ3)]- <i>RQ1_RQ3.zip</i> consists of the raw datasets and R script that replicate the graphs in our quantitative analysis.In order to replicate the figure 5, figure 6, and figure 7 in Section III, you are able to run the command below:“Rscript trendAnalysis_RQ1RQ2RQ3.R”This script generates figure 5, figure 6, and figure 7 in the same place as the script.<br>[Qualitative Analysis (RQ4 and RQ5)]- <i>RQ4_RQ5.zip</i> consists of two labeled contentious review datasets and two labeled non-contentious review datasets in each subject system (Nova and Qtbase).<br>- Abandoned and integrated contentious patch datasets are in ‘contention_spsn_snsp’ directory. For example, if you would like to see abandoned contentious (SP-SN and SN-SP) patches in Nova, you can find “nova_abandoned_spsn_snsp.csv”.- Abandoned and integrated NON-contentious patch<i> datasets </i>are in ‘non_contention’ directory. For example, if you would like to see integrated non-contentious patches in Qtbase, you can find “qtbase_integrated_non.csv”<br>[The Detailed Taxonomies (RQ4 and RQ5)]<i>Contention_NonContention_Comparison.pdf</i> consists of two taxonomies that explain the detailed reviewer concerns.- Table 1 shows the taxonomy that explains the reviewer concerns that raise contention in abandoned contentious (SP-SN and SN-SP) reviews. In addition to it, this table also does reviewer concerns that were raised without contention in abandoned non-contentious reviews.<br>- Table 2 shows the taxonomy that explains how reviewers resolve contention in integrated contentious (SP-SN and SN-SP) reviews. In addition to it, this table also does reviewer concerns that were raised without contention in integrated non-contentious reviews.

【摘要】为支撑后续相关研究，我们在此公开了可复现研究数据包，其中包含定量与定性数据，以及因篇幅限制未在论文中呈现的、关于争议性补丁被弃用与整合的原因的更详细层级分类体系。
【定量分析（研究问题1、研究问题2与研究问题3）】
- <i>RQ1_RQ3.zip</i> 包含复现定量分析图表所需的原始数据集与R脚本（R script）。若需复现论文第三章中的图5、图6与图7，可执行以下命令："Rscript trendAnalysis_RQ1RQ2RQ3.R"。该脚本将在与该脚本相同的目录下生成上述三张图表。
【定性分析（研究问题4与研究问题5）】
- <i>RQ4_RQ5.zip</i> 涵盖两个主题系统（Nova与Qtbase），每个系统均包含2套标注争议性评审数据集与2套标注非争议性评审数据集。
- 已被弃用与整合的争议性补丁数据集存放于`contention_spsn_snsp`目录中。例如，若需查看Nova系统中被弃用的（SP-SN与SN-SP类型）争议性补丁，可访问文件"nova_abandoned_spsn_snsp.csv"。
- 已被弃用与整合的非争议性补丁数据集存放于`non_contention`目录中。例如，若需查看Qtbase系统中被整合的非争议性补丁，可访问文件"qtbase_integrated_non.csv"。
【详细分类体系（研究问题4与研究问题5）】
- <i>Contention_NonContention_Comparison.pdf</i> 包含两套分类体系，用于阐释评审人员的具体关注点。
- 表1阐释了引发争议的评审关注点分类体系，这类争议发生在被弃用的（SP-SN与SN-SP类型）争议性评审中；除此以外，该表还涵盖了被弃用的非争议性评审中无争议的评审关注点。
- 表2阐释了评审人员如何解决已整合的（SP-SN与SN-SP类型）争议性评审中的争议的分类体系；除此以外，该表还涵盖了已整合的非争议性评审中无争议的评审关注点。