Plan statements for external consistency analysis: Evidence from Bucharest’s spatial plans

The present dataset is part of the published scientific paper Bacău, S., Grădinaru, S. R., & Hersperger, A. M. (2020). Spatial plans as relational data: Using social network analysis to assess consistency among Bucharest’s planning instruments. Land Use Policy, 92. The goal of this paper was to first develop a theoretical framework for external consistency assessment in spatial plans and then to test the framework with ten spatial plans of the Bucharest (Romania) region. Specifically, the paper has the following workflow: (i) to develop a framework for consistency assessment covering four categories of external consistency; (ii) to extract relevant plan statements from all plans on the four categories; (iii) to assign one-way, symmetrical and contradictory relationships between the extracted plan statements; and (iv) to assess consistencies, inconsistencies and contradictions between plans using directed and valued network analyses. All results were then validated by applying questionnaires to local experts. The study focuses on a sample consisting of 10 spatial plans of Bucharest that: (1) are currently in force, (2) have spatial implications, (3) involve different administrative levels and (4) come from different planning sectors. The list of the reviewed planning documents can be found in Table 2 of the paper. The framework of consistency assessment contains 24 items, which can be found in Table 1 of the paper. All planning documents were read in respect to all items of the framework in order to extract plan statements used in the analysis. As a result, we provide the plan statement extracted from 10 plans on the 24 items of the framework. All data is in Romanian. The data was discussed qualitatively in the research paper.

本数据集源自已发表的学术论文：Bacău, S., Grădinaru, S. R. 与 Hersperger, A. M.（2020）。该论文题为《空间规划作为关联数据：运用社交网络分析评估布加勒斯特各类规划工具间的一致性》，刊载于《土地利用政策（Land Use Policy）》第92卷。本论文的核心研究目标首先是构建空间规划外部一致性评估的理论框架，随后以罗马尼亚布加勒斯特地区的10项空间规划为对象，对该框架开展实证检验。具体而言，论文遵循如下研究流程：(i) 构建覆盖四类外部一致性维度的评估框架；(ii) 从全部规划文件中提取对应四类评估维度的相关规划表述；(iii) 为提取的规划表述赋予单向、对称及矛盾三类关系；(iv) 借助有向加权网络分析方法，评估各项规划间的一致性、不一致性与矛盾性。所有研究结果后续均通过向本地专家发放问卷完成效度验证。本研究的样本为10项布加勒斯特地区的空间规划，筛选标准如下：(1) 当前处于生效状态；(2) 具备空间影响属性；(3) 涵盖不同行政层级；(4) 来自不同规划领域。本次审阅的规划文件清单可参见论文表2。一致性评估框架共包含24项评估条目，详见论文表1。本研究针对评估框架中的全部24项条目，逐一审阅所有规划文件，以提取分析所需的规划表述。据此，本数据集提供了从10项规划中提取的、对应24项评估条目的规划表述。所有数据均采用罗马尼亚语呈现。该数据已在研究论文中完成定性讨论。