BEYOND_WP1_T1.1_Literature review_overview of literature list and Analysis.

Data sets for D1.1. The first part of this deliverable is a scoping review of the literature examining 147 articles published in peer review academic journals over the past ten years (2013-2023) on the promotion of research ethics and integrity (REI), and breaches of these standards including research misconduct (RM) and questionable research practices (QRPs). It also identifies current challenges, gaps in knowledge and practice, and opportunities for both further research, and policy and educational interventions to promote REI and mitigate RM and QRPs. Findings on state-of-the-art knowledge in REI research suggest some areas of consensus, including on the greater risks for early career researchers to commit RM and the value of responsible conduct of research (RCR) training, particularly approaches that emphasize ethical problem-solving skills. However, the study also identified a lack of consensus in other areas, including the rehabilitation and reintegration of researchers who committed RM. Key findings extracted from the review contribute to the understanding that the environment in which researchers operate and other contextual factors significantly influence RCR, rather than primarily the individual behavior of researchers. As such, these environmental and contextual factors require further research and policy attention.

本数据集对应交付件D1.1。该交付件的第一部分为一项文献范围综述，系统梳理了2013至2023年十年间发表于同行评审学术期刊的147篇相关文献，主题涵盖研究伦理与诚信（research ethics and integrity, REI）的推广实践，以及违反相关标准的行为——包括研究不端行为（research misconduct, RM）与可疑研究行为（questionable research practices, QRPs）。该综述同时明确了当前领域面临的挑战、知识与实践层面的空白，以及可用于开展进一步研究、制定政策与实施教育干预的契机，以推广研究伦理与诚信、防范研究不端行为与可疑研究行为的发生。
针对研究伦理与诚信领域现有前沿研究认知的分析结果显示，部分议题已达成学界共识，例如：早期职业研究者发生研究不端行为的风险更高，以及负责任研究行为（responsible conduct of research, RCR）培训的价值——尤其是侧重伦理问题解决能力培养的培训模式。
但本综述同时发现，其他议题尚未形成统一共识，例如对存在研究不端行为的研究者的矫治与重新融入科研共同体。
从本次综述中提取的关键结论进一步表明，研究者所处的工作环境及其他情境因素，对其负责任研究行为的影响远大于研究者个体的行为本身。因此，这类环境与情境因素亟需开展进一步研究并获得政策层面的关注。