Level of interaction of citizens with Local self-governance institutions in Syria: Results of 'Development Assets' surveys for the issues covering the period from Sep. 2018 to Aug. 2021.

The provided data is compiled from issues published by the Syrian initiative "Development Assets" which triennially publishes the results of surveys conducted among activists in Syria regarding their interaction with and opinions of different non-governmental and governmental organizations, including local self-governance institutions. This data set includes results from 9 issues: 2018 (T3 - September to December), 2019 (T1 - January - April), T2 ( May - August), T3, 2020 (T1,T2,T3) and 2021 (T1, T2). The selected data from the issues is provided in excel files. The survey samples for the studied period can be find in the file titled "Sample Development Assets sample selection for the period between 2018 T1 and 2021 T2". In Table S1 are presented the percentages of respondents' answers regarding the degree in which they believe in the ability of community action to influence the local development process. Table S2 presents the percentage of respondents' answers regarding the degree in which they believe in the ability of local administration personnel and elected officials to influence the local development process. Answer options are: "Not capable at all", "Not Capable", "Neutral", "Capable", "Very Capable", and "I don't know". Tables S1 and S2 do not provide data for 2018 (T3). In Table S3 are presented respondents' average ratings of the degree of interaction of different governmental and non-governmental actors with the needs of the local community. Data is provided for each studied trimester, as well as the average of all studied trimesters per year. The rating is given on a scale from 1 - 5 (1 responds to least interactive and 5 - most interactive). The studied actors are: Municipality, Neighbourhood committees , Mukhtar, NGOs , Religious, Institutions, Media, Government media, Private media, Social media, Private companies, Influential individuals, Unions and public organisations, Service-related institutions, International organizations. It is important to note that in 2018 T3, media was considered as one category, whereas in consequent trimesters Government media, Private media and Social media are considered separately. Data for Unions and Public Organizations is provided starting from 2019 T1, and for International organizations and Service-related institutions - from 2019 T2. Table S4 presents respondents' average ratings of their satisfaction with basic services provided in their areas (Health, Education, Telecommunication, Internet , Electricity, Water, Cleanliness, Fuel, Safety and Security, and Transport). In 2018, Internet and Communication were rated together, whereas in consequent trimesters they are divided into two separate categories, Telecommunication and Internet. In 2019 T1, data was provided for "Fuel for home use" and "Fuel for other use" separately. In all other trimesters they are provided jointly in one category "Fuel". Data for satisfaction with transport is provided starting 2019 T1.

本数据集的数据源自叙利亚“发展资产（Development Assets）”倡议发布的系列调研报告，该倡议每三年发布一次针对叙利亚活动家的调研成果，内容涵盖活动家与各类非政府组织（Non-Governmental Organization, NGO）、政府机构（含地方自治机构（local self-governance institutions））的互动情况及相关看法。本数据集涵盖9期调研结果，分别为2018年T3（9月至12月）、2019年T1（1月至4月）、2019年T2（5月至8月）、2019年T3、2020年T1、T2、T3以及2021年T1、T2。本次选取的系列报告数据以Excel文件形式提供。本调研周期的调研样本信息可在名为《2018年T1至2021年T2期间发展资产样本遴选》的文件中查阅。表S1展示了受访者对“社区行动影响地方发展进程的能力”的认可度占比情况。表S2展示了受访者对“地方行政人员与民选官员影响地方发展进程的能力”的认可度占比情况。问卷选项依次为：“完全无能力”“无能力”“中立”“有能力”“极具能力”以及“不知道”。表S1与表S2未收录2018年T3的相关数据。表S3展示了受访者对各类政府与非政府行为体响应地方社区需求的互动程度的平均评分，数据按各调研季度提供，同时包含各调研年度内所有季度的平均评分。评分采用1至5分制，其中1分代表互动程度最低，5分代表互动程度最高。本次调研涉及的行为体包括：市政当局、社区委员会、穆赫塔尔（Mukhtar）、非政府组织（Non-Governmental Organization, NGO）、宗教机构、媒体、政府媒体、私营媒体、社交媒体、私营企业、有影响力人士、工会与公共组织、服务相关机构以及国际组织。需特别说明的是，2018年T3将媒体归为单一类别，而后续调研季度则将媒体拆分为政府媒体、私营媒体与社交媒体三个独立类别。工会与公共组织的相关数据自2019年T1起开始收录，国际组织与服务相关机构的相关数据则自2019年T2起开始收录。表S4展示了受访者对所在地区提供的各类基础服务的满意度平均评分，涵盖医疗、教育、电信、互联网、电力、供水、卫生清洁、燃料、安全保障以及交通。2018年将互联网与通信合并为一个类别进行评分，而后续调研季度则将其拆分为电信与互联网两个独立类别。2019年T1单独收录了“家用燃料”与“其他用途燃料”的相关数据，其余所有调研季度均将其合并为“燃料”单一类别。交通服务满意度的相关数据自2019年T1起开始收录。