Multi-Trial Associative Recognition Memory Task with Metacognitive Judgments

These data are from an experiment studying the accuracy of metacognitive judgments (judgments of learning (JOLs), retrospective confidence judgments, estimated response times) in the context of an associative recognition task. The purpose of the study was to assess the influence of different cues on trial 2 JOLs, assessing the "memory for past test" heuristic. Individuals self-paced their study time for pairs of concrete nouns, and then received a yes/no associative recognition task, in which they were tested with intact pairs from study or rearranged pairs. The experimental program recorded responses and computed accuracy and latency. These data were analyzed and reported in a paper published in the Archives of Scientific Psychology, "Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Multiple Cues In Addition to Memory for Past Test Accuracy."

本数据集来自一项针对联想再认任务情境下元认知判断（metacognitive judgments）准确性的实验，所涉元认知判断包括学习判断（Judgments of Learning, JOLs）、回溯性信心判断（retrospective confidence judgments）以及估计反应时（estimated response times）。本研究旨在评估不同线索对第二轮学习判断的影响，以检验“过往测试记忆”启发式（"memory for past test" heuristic）。实验中，被试自主控制具体名词对的学习时长，随后完成是/否型联想再认任务（associative recognition task），测试材料为学习阶段呈现的完整词对或重组词对。实验程序记录被试反应并计算正确率与反应时。本数据集的分析结果已发表于《科学心理学档案》（Archives of Scientific Psychology），刊载论文题为《学习判断受除过往测试准确性记忆外的多重线索影响》（"Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Multiple Cues In Addition to Memory for Past Test Accuracy"）。