Nicotinevrije Schooldagen

In this project, Amsterdam's Municipal Health Service (GGD Amsterdam), in collaboration with partners, implement the intervention ‘nicotine-free school hours’ in 5 secondary schools (‘voortgezet onderwijs’). Research by Amsterdam UMC took place parallel to the implementation, with the aim to understand the implementation process.
We therefore answer the following research questions: 1) What is the context of the schools prior to the implementation of the nicotine-free school day? 2) What are hindering and facilitating factors in adoption and implementation of nicotine-free school hours, according to school management, employees and students? 3) How do smoking and vaping behaviour change in response to nicotine-free school hours, according to observations and perspectives of management, employees and students? 4) What, according to management, employees and students, can improve the implementation of the intervention?
We collected qualitative data, with some supportive quantitative data. Interviews and focus group discussions were held with, in total, 75 participants. These included students, teachers, support staff of the school and school management. interviews and focus groups were transcribed verbatim. Short demographic surveys were filled in by all participants. Observations around the participating schools, to count the number of smoking and vaping students, were carried out.
Due to the sensitivity of the collected data (qualitative data, including youth), the transcripts cannot be published or shared. The quantitative data is limited in its sample size and of a selective group, and is meant to be supportive to the qualitative data. Therefore, this is not deemed suitable for use by external parties.

本项目由阿姆斯特丹市政卫生服务中心（GGD Amsterdam）联合多方合作伙伴，在5所荷兰中等教育（voortgezet onderwijs）学校中推行“无烟校园时段（nicotine-free school hours）”干预措施。阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心（Amsterdam UMC）同步开展配套研究，旨在解析该干预举措的实施全流程。本研究旨在回应以下四项研究问题：1. 无烟校园时段正式实施前，各参与学校的整体背景状况如何？2. 据学校管理层、教职员工及学生反馈，该举措的采纳与落地存在哪些阻碍因素与促进因素？3. 结合现场观测数据与校方、教职工及学生的主观视角，无烟校园时段推行后，学生吸烟及电子烟使用行为发生了哪些变化？4. 据校方、教职工及学生的观点，可通过哪些路径优化该干预措施的实施效果？本研究采集了质性数据（qualitative data），并辅以少量量化数据（quantitative data）。研究累计开展访谈与焦点小组讨论（focus group discussions），纳入75名参与者，涵盖学生、教师、学校后勤人员及学校管理层。所有访谈及焦点小组讨论内容均进行逐字转录；全体参与者填写了简短的人口统计学调查问卷。此外，研究人员对参与项目的学校开展了现场观测，以统计吸烟及使用电子烟的学生人数。鉴于采集数据的敏感性（包含涉及青少年群体的质性数据），研究转录文本无法公开发布或共享。量化数据样本量有限且仅针对特定筛选群体，仅作为质性数据的辅助支撑材料，因此不适合外部机构使用。