five

Semiautomated Transition State Localization for Organometallic Complexes with Semiempirical Quantum Chemical Methods

收藏
Figshare2020-02-19 更新2026-04-28 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Semiautomated_Transition_State_Localization_for_Organometallic_Complexes_with_Semiempirical_Quantum_Chemical_Methods/11911113
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
We present an efficient computational protocol for robust transition state localization that can be routinely applied to complex (organometallic) reactions. The capabilities of the combination of extended tight-binding semiempirical methods (GFNn-xTB) with a state-of-the-art transition state localization algorithm (mGSM) is demonstrated on a modified version of the MOBH35 benchmark set, consisting of 29 organometallic reactions and transition states. Furthermore, for three examples we demonstrate how error-prone the conventional (manual) approach based on chemical intuition can be and how errors are avoided by a semiautomated generation of reaction profiles. The performance of the GFNn-xTB methods is carefully assessed and compared with that of the widely used PM6-D3H4 and PM7 semiempirical methods. The GFNn-xTB methods show much higher success rates of 89.7% (GFN1-xTB) and 86.2% (GFN2-xTB) compared with 72.4% for PM6-D3H4 and 69.0% for PM7. The barrier heights and reaction energies are computed with much better accuracy at reduced computational cost for the GFNn-xTB methods compared with the PMx methods, allowing a semiquantitative assessment of possible reaction pathways already at a semiempirical level. The mean error of GFN2-xTB for the barrier heights (8.2 kcal mol–1) is close to what low-cost density functional approximations provide and substantially smaller than the corresponding error of the competitor methods.

本研究提出一种可稳健定位过渡态(transition state)的高效计算方案,可常规应用于复杂有机金属(organometallic)反应体系。本研究将扩展紧束缚半经验方法(extended tight-binding semiempirical methods,GFNn-xTB)与先进过渡态定位算法(mGSM)相结合,并在修改版MOBH35基准测试集(benchmark set)上验证了该组合方案的性能;该基准测试集包含29个有机金属反应及过渡态。此外,通过三个实例,本研究展示了基于化学直觉的传统(手动)方法存在的易出错性,以及通过半自动化生成反应势能剖面(semiautomated generation of reaction profiles)如何规避此类误差。本研究对GFNn-xTB系列方法的性能进行了严谨评估,并与当前广泛使用的PM6-D3H4、PM7半经验方法进行了对比。GFNn-xTB系列方法展现出更高的成功率:GFN1-xTB为89.7%,GFN2-xTB为86.2%;而PM6-D3H4与PM7的成功率仅为72.4%与69.0%。相较于PMx系列方法,GFNn-xTB系列方法在更低的计算成本下,能以更高精度计算能垒高度与反应能量,使得仅依靠半经验级别计算即可对潜在反应路径进行半定量评估。GFN2-xTB计算能垒高度的平均误差为8.2 kcal mol⁻¹,接近低成本密度泛函近似(density functional approximations)的误差水平,且远低于对比方法的对应误差值。
创建时间:
2020-02-19
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作