Data for paper "Jordan - Embodied emissions policies – design options and political mobilisation potential"

The topic of greenhouse gas emissions embodied in products is gaining in prominence and the possibilities for measuring and verifying them are improving. This provides fertile ground for those who demand that climate policy should address such embodied emissions. There are different design options for policies targeting embodied emissions. Such differences affect which groups can be mobilised in their favour. This paper shows that procurement standards which target intermediate products can mobilise the support of relatively low carbon producers of high carbon materials, while product standards which target final products can mobilise the support of producers of relatively low carbon materials producers and knowledge-intensive service providers. Here the data for a network analysis corroborating the theoretical analysis in the paper is provided.An in-depth study of the <i>embodied emissions in buildings</i> policy field in Germany, the UK, and the USA yielded key umbrella organisations advocating for a greater role for embodied emissions in policy-making. An analysis of organisational affiliations with these umbrella organisations formed the basis for a network analysis testing the hypotheses specifying how variations in the inter- and intra-sectoral distributive effects of embodied emissions policy proposals correspond to differences in the composition of lobbying coalitions.The focus is on embodied emission policies in the form of regulatory standards for the built environment and public procurement specifications setting upper limits for embodied emissions of intermediate products. Carbon border adjustments or tariff walls targeting embodied carbon contents can also be considered embodied emissions policies but are not included in the analysis.Please note that not all organisations in this dataset can be classified as advocates for embodied emissions policies. Table 1 in the publication corresponding to this dataset shows the entities that were classified as `targets' in the embodied emissions network, i.e. the umbrella organisations whose member- and sponsorships were to be analysed. The target classification consists of two layers. On the one hand, those entities that are directly associated with advocacy or technical guidelines for the consideration of embodied emissions (first order). On the other hand, some of the organisations that are affiliated with the first, for example as sponsors or members (second order). Where the network nodes were associations, their member organisations and other associates, such as sponsors, were collected by analysing information on their affiliations from their websites in 2017 and 2018. The data on network nodes and edges was cleaned and standardised with OpenRefine. Some issues with the dataset were only discovered during the analysis process. The associated R code (DOI: 10.5522/04/24893487) takes care of these issues. However, if you do not intend to use this dataset with the associated R code, it is recommended to apply the following recoding:'natureplus e.V.' -&gt; 'natureplus''RICS Methdology' -&gt; 'RICS Methodology''UCL ISR' -&gt; 'UCL''natureplus ' -&gt; 'natureplus''B.A.U.M. e.V.' -&gt; 'B.A.U.M.''Arbeitsgemeinschaft Rohholzverbraucher e.V.' -&gt; 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Rohholzverbraucher e.V.'

产品内涵温室气体排放（greenhouse gas emissions embodied in products）这一议题的受关注度与日俱增，相关测算与验证手段也日趋完善。这为呼吁气候政策纳入此类内涵排放议题的群体提供了有利契机。针对内涵排放的政策存在多种设计方案，此类差异会影响能够被动员起来支持该政策的群体构成。本文研究表明，针对中间产品的采购标准能够争取到高碳材料领域相对低碳生产商的支持；而针对最终产品的产品标准，则可获得低碳材料生产商及知识密集型服务提供商的支持。本文配套提供了用于佐证该理论分析的网络分析数据集。

针对德国、英国及美国的《建筑内涵排放》政策领域开展的深度调研，筛选出了一批倡导在政策制定中强化内涵排放议题地位的核心伞状组织。通过分析与这些伞状组织的组织隶属关系，构建了网络分析的基础，以此检验相关假说：该假说阐明了内涵排放政策提案的部门间与部门内分配效应差异，如何与游说联盟的构成差异相对应。

本研究聚焦两类内涵排放政策：一是针对建成环境的监管标准，二是为中间产品内涵排放设定上限的公共采购规范。针对内涵碳含量的碳边境调节机制或关税壁垒，亦可被归类为内涵排放政策，但本研究未将其纳入分析范畴。

请注意，本数据集收录的所有组织中，并非全部都可被归类为内涵排放政策的倡导者。本数据集对应的出版物中的表1，列出了内涵排放网络中被归类为'targets'的实体，即需对其成员与赞助方信息进行分析的伞状组织。

目标主体的分类分为两个层级：其一为直接与内涵排放议题倡导或相关技术指南相关联的实体（一级目标）；其二为隶属于一级目标实体的组织（例如作为其赞助方或成员的组织，二级目标）。若网络节点为行业协会，则通过分析其2017年与2018年官网披露的隶属关系信息，收集其成员组织及其他关联方（如赞助方）的数据。

网络节点与边的数据通过OpenRefine进行了清洗与标准化处理。本数据集的部分问题仅在分析过程中才被发现。配套的R代码（DOI: 10.5522/04/24893487）可解决此类问题。但若无需将本数据集与配套R代码配合使用，则建议采用如下重编码规则：
1. 将'natureplus e.V.'重命名为'natureplus'
2. 将'RICS Methdology'修正为'RICS Methodology'
3. 将'UCL ISR'简化为'UCL'
4. 将'natureplus '（末尾带空格）修正为'natureplus'
5. 将'B.A.U.M. e.V.'简化为'B.A.U.M.'
6. 将'Arbeitsgemeinschaft Rohholzverbraucher e.V.'修正为'Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Rohholzverbraucher e.V.'