Comparison of the effects of random versus exploited species removals on communities FD.

One-way ANCOVA comparing the slopes and intercepts of regressions (between FD and community richness after the removal of 7, 15, 22 and 29 species) when species were removed by selecting only exploited versus randomly (E vs. R) from the regional species pool. All terms tested against the residual. Table shows only F-values and significance values as * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, and *** P<0.001.

单因素协方差分析（One-way ANCOVA）用于比较两种物种移除方式下，分别移除7、15、22和29个物种后，功能多样性（FD）与群落丰富度之间回归方程的斜率与截距。两种物种移除方式分别为：从区域物种库中仅选取被开发利用的物种（记为E组），以及随机选取物种（记为R组）。所有检验项均以残差作为检验基准。本次分析的表格仅展示F值与显著性结果：*代表P<0.05，**代表P<0.01，***代表P<0.001。