five

Animal characteristics.

收藏
Figshare2025-10-24 更新2026-04-28 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Animal_characteristics_/30441075
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Renal dysfunction in heart failure increases mortality, limits treatment options and blunts responses to therapy. Angiotensin receptor-blocker and neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) may preserve renal function by modulating both the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the natriuretic peptide system. We investigated the renal effects of the ARNI Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in rats with systolic dysfunction secondary to myocardial infarction. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent surgical MI induction and were randomized to six weeks of treatment with vehicle, valsartan or Sac/Val, and compared to sham operated animals. Renal function was evaluated by creatinine clearance, mean arterial pressure (MAP) by tail-cuff measurements, and cardiac function by magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Vehicle treated animals developed cardiorenal syndrome, with impaired cardiac systolic function and mild renal dysfunction. Both valsartan and Sac/Val preserved renal function compared to vehicle (creatinine clearance mL/min [median with interquartile range]; sham 5.4 [4.8–6.0], vehicle 4.5 [4.1–5.1], valsartan 5.1 [5.1–5.5], Sac/Val 5.1 [5.0–5.6]; vehicle vs valsartan p = 0.034 and vehicle vs Sac/Val p = 0.044). MAP was reduced by both treatments compared to sham and vehicle groups (MAP mmHg; sham 131 [116–138], vehicle 123 [115–132], valsartan 108 [99–112], Sac/Val 111 [99–119]; sham vs valsartan p mm; sham 4.1 [3.7–4.4], vehicle 4.6 [3.8–5.6], valsartan 4.6 [4.1–5.5], Sac/Val 3.9 [3.6–4.5]; vehicle vs Sac/Val p = 0.047, valsartan vs Sac/Val p = 0.017) despite no improvement in systolic function in either treatment group. Sac/Val initiated in the acute post-MI phase preserved renal function to the same extent as valsartan alone and uniquely reduced left atrial dilatation, suggesting additional benefits beyond renoprotection in the setting of persistent systolic dysfunction.

心力衰竭合并肾功能不全可升高患者死亡率、限制治疗选择并削弱治疗应答反应。血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂(Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, ARNI)可通过调节肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统与利钠肽系统来保护肾功能。本研究探讨了ARNI类药物沙库巴曲缬沙坦(Sacubitril/valsartan, Sac/Val)对心肌梗死(myocardial infarction, MI)继发性收缩功能障碍大鼠的肾脏效应。雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠经手术诱导MI后,被随机分为三组,分别接受溶剂对照、缬沙坦或Sac/Val治疗,共持续6周,并以假手术组作为对照。肾功能通过肌酐清除率评估,平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure, MAP)采用尾袖法测量,心功能则通过磁共振成像与超声心动图评估。溶剂对照组大鼠出现心肾综合征,表现为心脏收缩功能受损与轻度肾功能不全。与溶剂对照组相比,缬沙坦与Sac/Val均能保护肾功能(肌酐清除率单位:mL/min,数据以中位数[四分位间距]表示;假手术组:5.4[4.8~6.0],溶剂对照组:4.5[4.1~5.1],缬沙坦组:5.1[5.1~5.5],Sac/Val组:5.1[5.0~5.6];溶剂对照组vs缬沙坦组p=0.034,溶剂对照组vs Sac/Val组p=0.044)。与假手术组及溶剂对照组相比,两种治疗方案均可降低平均动脉压(MAP,单位:mmHg;假手术组:131[116~138],溶剂对照组:123[115~132],缬沙坦组:108[99~112],Sac/Val组:111[99~119];假手术组vs缬沙坦组p mm;假手术组:4.1[3.7~4.4],溶剂对照组:4.6[3.8~5.6],缬沙坦组:4.6[4.1~5.5],Sac/Val组:3.9[3.6~4.5];溶剂对照组vs Sac/Val组p=0.047,缬沙坦组vs Sac/Val组p=0.017),尽管两组治疗均未改善心脏收缩功能。在心肌梗死急性期启动Sac/Val治疗,其肾功能保护效果与单用缬沙坦相当,且可特异性降低左心房扩张程度,提示在持续性心脏收缩功能障碍的背景下,Sac/Val具有肾脏保护之外的额外获益。
创建时间:
2025-10-24
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作