five

Cost analysis of casting techniques.

收藏
Figshare2025-04-29 更新2026-04-28 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Cost_analysis_of_casting_techniques_/28896350
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
The aim of this study was to compare the compressive strength, microstructural characteristics, and cost-effectiveness of cast dental posts fabricated using two techniques: torch casting (TC) and electric arc casting (EAC), both integral to the lost wax method. Employing an applied research approach with an experimental design, the study analyzed 40 non-precious gold (NPG) alloy cast posts, divided equally into two groups of 20 for each technique. The selection process was non-probabilistic and based on convenience, with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure precision and relevance. The results reveal a significant advantage for the EAC technique. In Essay 1, EAC posts exhibited a mean compressive strength of 206.102 MPa, compared to 157.207 MPa for TC posts. Similarly, in Essay 2, EAC posts showed a mean strength of 172.625 MPa versus 136.303 MPa for TC posts. These differences were statistically significant (p

本研究旨在对比两种失蜡法(lost wax method)核心制备工艺——火焰铸造(torch casting, TC)与电弧铸造(electric arc casting, EAC)所制铸造牙科桩的抗压强度、微观结构特征与成本效益。本研究采用应用研究路径与实验设计方案,对40件非贵金属金(non-precious gold, NPG)合金铸造桩开展分析,将其均分为两组,每组20件分别对应两种铸造工艺。样本选取采用非概率便利抽样法,并设置明确的纳入与排除标准以保障研究的精准性与相关性。研究结果显示电弧铸造工艺具备显著优势:在试验1中,电弧铸造桩的平均抗压强度为206.102 MPa,火焰铸造桩则为157.207 MPa;同理,试验2中电弧铸造桩的平均抗压强度达172.625 MPa,火焰铸造桩仅为136.303 MPa。上述差异均具有统计学显著性(p
创建时间:
2025-04-29
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作