DEVELOPMENT OF METRICS FOR ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN PROFESSIONAL MASTER'S COURSE

Objective: Propose metric to qualify the production conveyed through articles published in Professional Master's Programs and, from there, to establish guidance for the evaluation of postgraduate programs of Medicine III. Method: Analysis of the documents of 2013 area graduate programs strict sense concerning the application and measurement of score the articles published, and creation of proposal for metric of the theme with the quadrennial review of Medicine III. Results: Were evaluated the medicines area documents I, II and III; Biological Sciences (I) and Interdisciplinary, as well as the 2013 reports of CAPES. All programs establish metrics for "Classification of Published Articles" within its bibliographic production although with different percentages respecting its specificities. With these data collected and correlating their relevance with the surgical areas, was drafted proposal for quantification of the quality of the published articles to "Professional Postgraduate Programs" at surgical area that have specific characteristics according to their guidelines, directing their scientific production to technique journals preferably. Conclusion: The metric suggested for published articles, that should be included in intellectual production of the Area Document, should be considered for the extract A1 = 100 points; A2 = 85 points; B1 = 80 points; B2 = 70 points; B3 = 60 points; B4 = 40 points and B5 = 20 points.

研究目标：提出用于评价专业硕士项目（Professional Master's Programs）发表论文所体现的学术产出的量化指标，并以此为基础建立医学III类研究生项目的评估指南。
研究方法：对2013年度严格意义上的各学科领域研究生项目中已发表论文的得分评定与测算方法展开分析，并结合医学III类研究生项目的四年一度评审要求，提出本主题的量化指标方案。
研究结果：本次研究评估的资料涵盖医学学科I、II、III类文档、生物学（I类）及跨学科项目相关材料，同时纳入巴西高等教育人员发展协调局（Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior，简称CAPES）2013年度的项目报告。所有项目均在其学术文献成果评价体系中设置了"已发表论文分类"的量化指标，但结合各自学科特性设置了差异化的权重占比。研究团队在收集上述数据并将其相关性与外科领域进行关联后，起草了针对外科领域专业硕士研究生项目的已发表论文质量量化方案——此类项目需遵循专属培养指南，具备独特学科特性，科研产出应优先投向专业技术期刊。
研究结论：本次提出的论文量化评价指标应纳入学科文档的学术成果要求体系，对应的期刊分区评分标准为：A1类100分、A2类85分、B1类80分、B2类70分、B3类60分、B4类40分、B5类20分。