Association between compliance to lymphedema management techniques and lymphedema progression since previous time point. Khurda District, Odisha State, India, July 2009–July 2011.

*Adjusted results of logistic regression for correlated data. Each rate ratio is comparing the rate of ADLA episodes among those who are compliant to the rate among those who are not compliant within the specified clinical disease groups.φDichotomized compliance score summarizing compliance to soap, cream, elevation, exercise, and footwear. Adjusted for baseline lymphedema status (advanced vs. early), inter-digital entry lesions at the previous time point, and number of time patient participated in MDA.†Adjusted for baseline lymphedema status (advanced vs. early), inter-digital entry lesions at the previous time point, number of time patient participated in MDA, and compliance to all other techniques.γOnly among those with inter-digital entry lesions at the previous time point. Adjusted for baseline lymphedema status (advanced vs. early), number of time patient participated in MDA, and compliance to soap, elevation, exercise, and wearing footwear.‡Inter-digital entry lesions at previous time point.Association between compliance to lymphedema management techniques and lymphedema progression since previous time point. Khurda District, Odisha State, India, July 2009–July 2011.