five

1U系列终端产品专利价值分析数据

收藏
浙江省数据知识产权登记平台2025-07-16 更新2025-07-17 收录
下载链接:
https://www.zjip.org.cn/home/announce/trends/149970
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
1U系列终端产品高价值专利数据,采集自公司自建专题数据库的发明专利和实用新型数据,对专利数据进行人工标引、评价打分、综合量化。有助于领域内的创新主体快速获得该领域内的高价值专利信息,加快对1U系列终端产品领域核心技术检索效率,同时基于检索结果,企业可以结合专利具体信息深入分析,例如:按年份申请量分析发展趋势、按专利综合价值分析技术创新能力或水平差异,引导企业自身研发方向,避免重复研发及专利纠纷产生。数据基于AHP层次分析法,采用定量与定性相结合的分析方法,从专利价值度法出发,将专利价值指标体系分为技术价值、法律价值、经济价值3项指标; 技术价值指标由专利类型、同族专利数、引证数、技术先进性、技术可替代性等进行归一化处理得到,发明专利得分高于实用新型,同族、引证数越多分数越高,技术先进性、技术可替代性等由领域内技术人员进行评价打分,技术先进性越高分数越高,技术可替代性越低,分数越高; 法律价值指标由独立权利要求数量、权项数、专利稳定性、专利可规避性等进行归一化处理得到,独立权利要求数量、权项数越多分数越高,专利稳定性、专利可规避性由公司专利工程师进行人工评估打分,专利稳定性越强分数越高,专利可替代性越低分数越高; 经济价值指标由转让、许可、质押融资、市场规模等进行归一化处理得到,转让、许可、质押融资次数越多,金额越高,分数越高,市场规模由公司市场人员进行评估打分,规模越大分数越高; 根据以上指标建立3个维度的矩阵,分别利用层次分析法进行量化评估,得到综合评分,满分100分;最后,采用公式专利综合价值=α×技术价值+β×法律价值+γ×经济价值,α,β,γ为权重,且α=0.5,β=0.3,γ=0.2,据此所计算的专利综合价值越高代表专利的价值就越高,专利综合价值大于60为高价值专利。

High-value patent data for 1U series terminal products is collected from invention patents and utility model patents stored in the company's self-built specialized database, with manual indexing, scoring, and comprehensive quantification conducted on the collected patent data. This dataset enables innovation subjects in the field to quickly obtain high-value patent information related to 1U series terminal products, and accelerates the efficiency of core technology retrieval in this domain. Meanwhile, based on the retrieval results, enterprises can conduct in-depth analysis by combining specific patent information, such as analyzing development trends via annual application volumes, and examining differences in technological innovation capabilities or levels based on comprehensive patent value, helping enterprises guide their own R&D directions and avoid redundant R&D and patent disputes. This dataset is developed based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), adopting a mixed analytical method of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Starting from the patent value assessment framework, the patent value index system is divided into three indicators: technological value, legal value, and economic value. The technological value indicator is derived through normalization based on patent type, number of patent families, number of citations, technological advancement, technological substitutability, and other factors. Invention patents score higher than utility models. The more patent families and citations there are, the higher the score. Technological advancement and substitutability are evaluated and scored by technical personnel in the field: the higher the technological advancement, the higher the score; the lower the technological substitutability, the higher the score. The legal value indicator is derived through normalization based on the number of independent claims, total number of claims, patent stability, patent avoidability, and other factors. The more independent claims and total claims there are, the higher the score. Patent stability and avoidability are manually evaluated and scored by the company's patent engineers: the stronger the patent stability, the higher the score; the lower the patent substitutability, the higher the score. The economic value indicator is derived through normalization based on transfer, licensing, pledge financing, market size, and other factors. The more times of transfer, licensing, and pledge financing occur, and the higher the corresponding transaction amount, the higher the score. Market size is evaluated and scored by the company's marketing personnel: the larger the market size, the higher the score. A three-dimensional matrix is established based on the above indicators, and quantitative evaluation is performed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process respectively to obtain a comprehensive score with a full score of 100. Finally, the formula for comprehensive patent value is adopted: Comprehensive Patent Value = α × Technological Value + β × Legal Value + γ × Economic Value, where α, β, and γ are weights with values of 0.5, 0.3, and 0.2 respectively. The higher the calculated comprehensive patent value, the higher the actual value of the patent. Patents with a comprehensive patent value greater than 60 are classified as high-value patents.
提供机构:
浙江正泰电器股份有限公司
创建时间:
2025-06-30
搜集汇总
数据集介绍
main_image_url
背景与挑战
背景概述
该数据集是1U系列终端产品的专利价值分析数据,包含1788条记录,每年更新一次,涵盖了专利的基本信息和价值评估指标,适用于制造业领域的创新主体进行高价值专利检索和技术分析。
以上内容由遇见数据集搜集并总结生成
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务