five

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Measuring Classical Pathway Complement Activity

收藏
PubMed Central2026-05-16 收录
下载链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC95674/
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
The complement system plays an important role in host defense against infection and in most inflammatory processes. The standard 50% hemolytic complement (CH(50)) assay is the most commonly used method of screening patient sera for functional activity of the classical complement pathway. Our objective in this study was to compare two newer methods (the enzyme immunoassay and the liposome immunoassay) to a commercial CH(50) assay for measuring total classical complement activity. We conclude that both newer methods compare well with a CH(50) assay and are equally sensitive in screening routine clinical sera.
提供机构:
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作