Comparison of Three Different Methods for Measuring Classical Pathway Complement Activity
收藏PubMed Central2026-05-16 收录
下载链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC95674/
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
The complement system plays an important role in host defense against infection and in most inflammatory processes. The standard 50% hemolytic complement (CH(50)) assay is the most commonly used method of screening patient sera for functional activity of the classical complement pathway. Our objective in this study was to compare two newer methods (the enzyme immunoassay and the liposome immunoassay) to a commercial CH(50) assay for measuring total classical complement activity. We conclude that both newer methods compare well with a CH(50) assay and are equally sensitive in screening routine clinical sera.
提供机构:
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)



