Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Cross-Cultural Academic Integrity Questionnaire: CCAIQ-2
收藏DataCite Commons2024-03-11 更新2024-08-19 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Reliability_and_validity_of_the_Chinese_version_of_the_Cross-Cultural_Academic_Integrity_Questionnaire_CCAIQ-2/25378894
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
This study revises the Cross-Cultural Academic Integrity Questionnaire Version 2 (CCAIQ-2) and examines its reliability and validity in Chinese college students to verify the suitability of the scale for measuring their academic integrity level. A total of 980 students participated in the study via a questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis suggested three meaningful factors: copying, cheating, and complying. Results of the reliability and validity analyses indicated that the revised Chinese version of the CCAIQ-2 can measure the academic integrity level of Chinese college students. The analysis showed differences in the academic integrity levels of college students by gender, grade, and major.
本研究对跨文化学术诚信问卷第二版(Cross-Cultural Academic Integrity Questionnaire Version 2,CCAIQ-2)进行修订,并以中国大学生为样本检验其信效度,以验证该量表用于测评中国大学生学术诚信水平的适用性。共计980名大学生通过问卷方式参与本研究。探索性因素分析提取出三个具备理论意义的维度:抄袭、作弊与遵规。信效度分析结果表明,修订后的CCAIQ-2中文版可有效测评中国大学生的学术诚信水平。分析还显示,不同性别、年级与专业的大学生其学术诚信水平存在显著差异。
提供机构:
figshare
创建时间:
2024-03-11



