Erratum. Corrected version of Fig. 3 (which originally appeared in Del Grosso et al., 2008, Ecology 89:2117–2126): Potential biome classification; total net primary production (TNPP) for potential native vegetation predicted by the NCEAS model described in this paper; TNPP predicted using the NCEAS model subtracted from TNPP predicted by the Miami model (Lieth 1975); aboveground net primary production (ANPP) for potential native vegetation predicted by the NCEAS model; and the trend in TNPP...

Corrected version of Fig. 3 (which originally appeared in Del Grosso et al., 2008, Ecology 89:2117–2126): Potential biome classification; total net primary production (TNPP) for potential native vegetation predicted by the NCEAS model described in this paper; TNPP predicted using the NCEAS model subtracted from TNPP predicted by the Miami model (Lieth 1975); aboveground net primary production (ANPP) for potential native vegetation predicted by the NCEAS model; and the trend in TNPP from 1901 to 2000 estimated using the NCEAS model.

图3的校正版本（最初发表于Del Grosso等人2008年发表于《Ecology》第89卷第2117–2126页的研究）：潜在生物群系分类；本文所述NCEAS模型预测的潜在原生植被总净初级生产力（total net primary production, TNPP）；迈阿密模型（Lieth 1975）预测的总净初级生产力减去本文所述NCEAS模型预测的总净初级生产力所得差值；NCEAS模型预测的潜在原生植被地上净初级生产力（aboveground net primary production, ANPP）；以及基于NCEAS模型估算的1901年至2000年总净初级生产力变化趋势。