five

Detailed results of the adjusted ROC analysis for ADC and all 3 raters at 1.5 and 3 T.

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-08 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Detailed_results_of_the_adjusted_ROC_analysis_for_ADC_and_all_3_raters_at_1_5_and_3_T_/970840
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
am0: adjusted model, adjusted for lesion volume, sex, thrombolysis, NIHSS). bm1: m0 additionally adjusted for age. cm2: m1 additionally adjusted for time (stroke-to-imaging). dm3: m1 and rater specific ADC-ROI values. In contrast to DWI (see table 3), adding the ADC-ROI-values for each rater (model 3[m3]) as a variable led to only a bad to moderate accuracy for the prediction of FLAIR-hyperintensities for each rater in comparison with the basic models (m0 and m1). The AUC was even inferior to m2, which was based on “time-from-stroke-onset”. Thus, ADC maps cannot reliably predict FLAIR-hyperintensities in contrast to DWI-maps. Please see figure 3 for the respective ROC-curves for each model. AUC, Area under the curve.
创建时间:
2014-03-21
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务