Food Information Data

The figures were based on historical analysis and consumer behavior deductive reasoning to obtain relevant data.
Table 1 shows that survey of consumers’ opinions on and degree of confidence in the quality and safety of commercially available food:In 2015, according to a survey on awareness of food quality and safety focussed on urban residents, 87% of consumers responded that they took quality and safety into consideration when buying food, and 78% thought that food that was commercially available was not safe.
Table 2 shows that in the context of an increasing number of products accompanied by inadequate information about safety, the likelihood with which consumers choose products irrationally increases, which consequently increases the risk of making a wrong choice. In other words, when fewer products with accurate quality and safety information are available, the risk of wrong consumption choices increases. Conversely, the greater the number of products with accurate information, the higher the proportion of consumers who make the right choices.
Table 3 shows that the reasons consumers chose defective products and risked the possible detrimental effects from such choices were as follows: 1) Most consumers are not involved in the production of food under the Commodity Economy and are isolated from product information. 2) The rapid development of production technology and changes in product categories contribute to a lack of knowledge among consumers about the products, leading them to make irrational choices about new products. 3) Consumers are misled by inaccurate information.

本数据集基于历史分析与消费者行为演绎推理，以获取相关数据。表1展示了消费者对市面上食品质量与安全性的看法及其信心程度：在2015年的针对城市居民的食品安全意识调查中，87%的消费者表示他们在购买食品时会考虑质量与安全性，而78%的人认为市面上销售的食品并不安全。
表2揭示了在产品数量日益增多而安全性信息不足的背景下，消费者做出非理性选择的可能性增加，这进而增加了错误选择的危险。换句话说，当准确的质量与安全性信息的产品较少时，错误消费选择的风险增加。相反，准确信息的产品数量越多，做出正确选择的消费者比例就越高。
表3展示了消费者选择有缺陷的产品并冒着可能产生不利影响的危险的原因如下：1）大多数消费者并未参与商品经济中的食品生产，且与产品信息隔离。2）生产技术的快速发展和产品类别的变化导致消费者对产品知识缺乏，使他们对新产品做出非理性的选择。3）消费者被不准确的信息所误导。