Replication Data for: Mineral Scale Formation During Crossflow Reverse Osmosis at Constant Flux and Constant Transmembrane Pressure Conditions

Mineral scale formation on membrane surfaces is a significant challenge in reverse osmosis water purification. Laboratory fouling experiments are typically run such that the transmembrane pressure (TMP) is fixed, and the permeate flux decreases over time as scales accumulate on the membrane surface. However, this change in flux means that the hydrodynamic conditions at the membrane surface are continuously changing, which could affect crystallization and foulant deposition processes. Operating under constant permeate flux conditions, in contrast, is advantageous because it keeps the hydrodynamic conditions relatively consistent, making it possible to compare how membrane properties (e.g., surface chemistry) affect fouling propensity. Industrial reverse osmosis operations are not run strictly in either constant TMP or constant flux mode; while they may start at a constant TMP, feed pressure may be periodically adjusted to maintain permeate water production within a specified range. The scarcity of constant permeate flux reverse osmosis scaling experiments reported in the literature frustrates efforts to compare membrane fouling processes under constant TMP and constant flux conditions. For the first time, the evolution of the fouling layer resistance was compared as a function of cumulative permeate volume per membrane area during constant TMP and constant flux reverse osmosis filtrations. Scaling experiments were conducted by challenging commercial reverse osmosis membranes with a model feed solution nearly saturated with calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum). At low fluxes, the increase in fouling layer resistance was quantitatively similar for the two operational modes. In contrast, at high fluxes, the fouling layer resistance increased more rapidly in constant flux filtration than in constant TMP filtration. The mechanism of scale formation in constant TMP and constant flux operation was self-limiting and self-reinforcing, respectively.