Data from: A survey of researchers' needs and priorities for data sharing

In May-June 2020 PLOS surveyed researchers from Europe and North America to rate tasks associated with data sharing on (i) their importance to researchers and (ii) researchers' satisfaction with their ability to complete those tasks. <br>Researchers were recruited via direct email campaigns, promoted Facebook and Twitter posts, a post on the PLOS Blog, and emails to industry contacts who distributed the survey on our behalf. Participation was incentivized with 3 random prize draws, which were managed separately to maintain anonymity.<br><br>This dataset consists of:1) The survey sent to researchers (pdf).2) The anonymised data export of survey results (xlsx).<br>The data export has been processed to retain the anonymity of participants. The comments left in the final question of the survey (question 17) have been removed. Answers to questions 12 to 16 have been recoded to give each answer a numerical value (see 'Scoring' tab of spreadsheet). The counts, means and standard deviations used in the associated preprint (https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/njr5u) for each factor are given in rows 1479-1481.

2020年5—6月，PLOS针对欧洲与北美地区的研究人员开展调研，要求受访者对与数据共享相关的各项任务从两个维度进行评分：一是该任务对研究人员的重要程度，二是研究人员对自身完成该任务能力的满意度。

本次调研通过定向邮件推广活动、Facebook与Twitter平台的推广帖、PLOS博客推文，以及向代为转发调研的行业联系人发送邮件等渠道招募参与者。调研为参与者设置了3次随机抽奖作为激励，抽奖流程独立运作以保障匿名性。

本数据集包含以下两项内容：1）面向研究人员发放的调研问卷（PDF格式）；2）调研结果的匿名数据导出文件（XLSX格式）。

该数据导出文件已完成匿名化处理，已移除调研最后一题（第17题）中受访者留下的评论内容。针对第12至16题的作答，已完成编码转换，为每个选项赋予对应数值（详见电子表格的"Scoring"标签页）。相关预印本（https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/njr5u）中各维度对应的频数、均值与标准差，对应电子表格的第1479至1481行。