Recurrent_3

Data for Study 3 reported in Lewandowsky, S.; Cook, J.; Oberauer, K.; Brophy, S.; Lloyd, E. A. & Marriott, M. Recurrent Fury: Conspiratorial Discourse in the Blogosphere Triggered by Research on the Role of Conspiracist Ideation in Climate Denial Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2015, 3, 142-178.

The layout of columns in the data file is as follows:
columns 1-5:
1=subject # (random, no identifying information available of any kind)
2=search (1=depth first; 2=breadth first)
3=trial
4=comment ID
5=typeofComment (0=web; 1=PhD)

+++

columns 6-10: responses on 0-9 scale to the 4 questions
qmotives
suspicion
victim
mustbewrong
reasonablecritique

+++

See Method section of paper for further details on interpretation.

The participant consent forms used by this study neither explicitly endorsed nor ruled out public posting of the data. I am therefore making the data are available to credentialed scholars only.

本数据集对应Lewandowsky S、Cook J、Oberauer K、Brophy S、Lloyd E A 及 Marriott M 发表于《社会与政治心理学杂志（Journal of Social and Political Psychology）》2015年第3卷第142-178页的论文《循环怒火：气候否认中阴谋思维作用研究引发的博客圈阴谋话语（Recurrent Fury: Conspiratorial Discourse in the Blogosphere Triggered by Research on the Role of Conspiracist Ideation in Climate Denial）》中的研究3所用数据。

数据文件的列布局如下：
列1至5：
1=被试编号（随机生成，无任何可识别信息）
2=搜索方式（1=深度优先；2=广度优先）
3=试次
4=评论ID
5=评论类型（0=网络评论；1=博士（PhD）评论）

+++

列6至10：针对4个问题的0-9分量表作答结果，对应变量分别为：qmotives、suspicion、victim、mustbewrong、reasonablecritique

有关变量解释的更多细节，请参见该论文的方法部分。

本研究使用的被试知情同意书未明确认可也未禁止公开发布该数据。因此，本数据集仅向具备资质的学者开放获取。