Additional file 8: of Comprehensive assessment of multiple biases in small RNA sequencing reveals significant differences in the performance of widely used methods
收藏DataCite Commons2020-08-27 更新2024-07-27 收录
下载链接:
https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/Additional_file_8_of_Comprehensive_assessment_of_multiple_biases_in_small_RNA_sequencing_reveals_significant_differences_in_the_performance_of_widely_used_methods/8310632/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Table S6. Clontech subsample analysis. The original number of reads was retained for all methods other than Clontech. The variation in the number of detected miRNAs (number of those with >â 10 normalized reads) for the other methods demonstrates the influence of the inclusion of the different Clontech subsets on the DESeq2 normalization. The normalization in this case only included these samples, therefore there may be differences compared to the other tables. (XLSX 34 kb)
补充表S6. Clontech子样本分析。除Clontech方法外,其余方法均保留原始测序读段(reads)数目。其余方法检测得到的微小RNA(microRNA,miRNA)数目(即归一化读段数大于10的微小RNA数量)的差异,表明纳入不同Clontech子集对DESeq2标准化流程存在影响。本次分析所采用的标准化仅纳入了这些样本,因此与其他表格的结果可能存在差异。(XLSX格式,文件大小34 KB)
提供机构:
figshare
创建时间:
2019-06-22



