Gender privileges and access to academic discourse in the field of criminal sciences

Abstract It is a comparative analysis of the gender composition of lecturers and of the gender composition of work presentation groups in national and international academic events of criminal sciences carried out in Brazil. It concluded a balance in the composition of men and women of the Working Groups, selected through double blind review system, but an under-representation of women in qualified speech and privileged spaces.

摘要：本研究针对巴西举办的刑事科学领域国内外学术活动中讲师与学术汇报工作组的性别构成展开对比分析。研究结果显示，经双盲评审制度遴选产生的工作组男女成员构成较为均衡，但女性在正式学术演讲及核心发言空间中的代表性仍存在不足。