Labour Force Survey 1993, Year file

Labour Force Survey 1993 - merged year file.

As of the 1st quarter of 1972, SSB has conducted official quarterly labour force surveys (AKU). These surveys aim to give the labour force authorities (and other people interested) knowledge of the occupational structure of the population and how it develops over time. The surveys are meant to give a foundation and statistical material for occupational prognoses and labour research. The samples in AKU are from 1992 representative at county level. In the period 1972-1991 they were representative on county pair level.

Originally, AKU respondents were interviewed in two consecutive quarters of a year, followed by a pause of two quarters, and then another two quarters of interviews. The sample was approximately 10-11.000 respondents in each quarter up until 1988. Originally, AKU was intended to be an analytical supplement to the monthly occupational statistics that was based on the social security membership index file. However, the social security-based statistics disappeared when the sickness benefit was included in the National Insurance as of 1st of January 1971, and AKU has after gradually developed into the most significant source of knowledge of the state of the labour market and its development.

In 1975, Statistics Norway changed the sampling frame of survey research, see article 37: “Om bruk av stikkprøver ved kontoret for intervjuundersøkelser”, SSB (About the Use of Random Samples at the Office for Survey Research, Statistics Norway) by Steinar Tamsfoss, and SØS 33: “Prinsipper og metoder for Statistisk sentralbyrås utvalgsundersøkelse (Principles and Methods for Statistics Norway's sample research) by Ib Thomsen. Simultaneously, the method for estimation of inflation to national numbers was changed, so that reasonable numbers for regions do exist from 1975 and onwards. The change in 1975 led to a different way of interviewing in groups. This caused amongst other things a break with the AKU panel systematics.

In the AKU survey of 1976, a slightly changed questionnaire was introduced. Also, there was a return to the original 6-quarter rotation scheme. The new questionnaire implied a better identification of family workers and persons that are temporarily without paid work. Thus, 30-35 000 more people were defined as employed. The group of "job-seekers without income" were also extended to include persons that were on an involuntary leave of absence. The questions concerning underemployment and “over employment” in the original questionnaire were abandoned.

From the 1st quarter of 1987, the estimation method (inflation to national numbers) was slightly changed. There was also a minor adjustment in the definition of employment. In order to ensure that the numbers were to be comparable to earlier surveys, new versions of the 1980-1986 AKU-files were drawn up. Consequently two versions of the 1980-1987 files - respectively with the old and new methods of estimation - exist. The “old” means that the data are comparable to the original numbers published in the period of 1972 - 1987, whilst the “new” implies that the data are comparable to numbers published after 1987.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Between the 1st and 2nd quarter of 1988, the AKU file description was changed. The variable “Labour-market status” was given a different coding. In addition, adjustments in the data collections were made - from interviewing a specific week every quarter to carry out continuous weekly interviews. SSB also started up an escalation scheme to increase the sample size. This affected the weights, and from the 2nd quarter of 1988, these were recalculated monthly. To balance out the quarterly or yearly files to total national numbers, the monthly weights therefore had to be divided in three or twelve to give the correct total number.

In 1996, AKU was significantly revised: The questionnaire, the file description and the standard for coding of industry and occupation. The data collection also changed to CATI - Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing. A new classification of industry was put into use (NOS C 182, based on the EU standard NACE, Rev.1). This standard was updated in 2002 and 2007. Also, the new occupational classification (STYRK) based on ISCO 88 was used from 1996 and onwards. The variable indicating socio-economic status was omitted, as a similar variable was not developed in the new occupational classification.

As from January 2006 some major changes were introduced to AKU in order to enhance its comparability to similar surveys in other countries. The changes consist of minor definitional adjustments of unemployment, some adjustments and enlargement of the questionnaire and a change in age definition (age at reference point instead of at the end of the year). Simultaneously the lower age limit to be included in AKU was lowered from 16 to 15 years. This led to some breaks in the time series in the mentioned areas.

1993年劳动力调查——合并年度数据集。

挪威统计统计局（SSB，Statistics Norway）自1972年第一季度起开展官方季度劳动力调查（AKU）。本次调查旨在为劳动力管理部门及其他相关方提供人口职业结构及其随时间演变的相关信息，为职业预测与劳动力研究提供基础数据与统计资料。

1992年起，AKU的样本在县级层面具备代表性；1972年至1991年期间，样本则在县域配对层级具备代表性。

最初，AKU的受访对象在一年中的两个连续季度接受访谈，随后暂停两个季度，再开展后续两个季度的访谈。1988年之前，每季度的受访样本量约为10000至11000人。

AKU最初旨在作为基于社会保障参保索引文件的月度职业统计的分析补充，但1971年1月1日病假福利纳入国民保险后，基于社会保障的月度职业统计随之废止，AKU也逐渐演变为劳动力市场现状及其发展态势的核心信息来源。

1975年，挪威统计统计局（Statistics Norway）调整了调查研究的抽样框架，相关内容可参见Steinar Tamsfoss撰写的SSB报告第37篇《Om bruk av stikkprøver ved kontoret for intervjuundersøkelser》（译名为《调查研究办公室随机样本使用规范》），以及Ib Thomsen撰写的SØS 33报告《Prinsipper og metoder for Statistisk sentralbyrås utvalgsundersøkelse》（译名为《挪威统计统计局抽样调查的原则与方法》）。与此同时，全国层面的通胀估算方法也进行了调整，1975年起可生成合理的区域层面统计数据。1975年的调整使得分组访谈方式发生变化，其中一项直接后果是打破了AKU的固定追踪调查体系。

1976年的AKU调查启用了小幅修订后的问卷，同时恢复了最初的6季度轮换调查方案。新版问卷可更精准地识别家庭用工者与临时无薪工作者群体，据此被界定为就业者的人数增加了3万至3.5万人。“无收入求职者”群体的界定范围也得到扩大，纳入了非自愿休假的人员，原版问卷中关于就业不足与“过度就业”的相关问题被移除。

1987年第一季度起，全国层面的通胀估算方法进行了小幅调整，就业界定标准也做出了微调。为确保数据与此前调查的可比性，研究人员编制了1980年至1986年AKU数据集的两个版本，因此1980年至1987年的数据集存在两个版本，分别采用旧版与新版估算方法。其中“旧版”数据可与1972年至1987年期间发布的原始数据进行对比，“新版”数据则可与1987年之后发布的数据进行对比。

1988年第一季度至第二季度期间，AKU数据集的变量说明进行了调整，“劳动力市场状态”变量的编码方式发生变更。此外，数据采集方式也做出调整：从每季度固定一周开展访谈改为持续每周开展访谈。挪威统计统计局还启动了样本量扩容计划，这一调整对样本权重产生了影响，自1988年第二季度起，样本权重改为每月重新计算。为使季度或年度数据集与全国总数据保持平衡，需将月度权重除以3或12，以得到准确的总样本量。

1996年，AKU进行了重大修订，涉及问卷、数据集说明以及行业与职业编码标准。数据采集方式也改为CATI（计算机辅助电话访谈，Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing）。新版行业分类标准（NOS C 182，基于欧盟NACE Rev.1标准）正式启用，该标准分别于2002年与2007年进行了更新。1996年起，基于ISCO 88标准的新版职业分类体系（STYRK）开始投入使用。由于新版职业分类体系未设置对应的社会经济地位变量，原有的社会经济地位变量被移除。

2006年1月起，AKU进行了多项重大调整，以提升其与其他国家同类调查的可比性。调整内容包括：对失业界定标准进行小幅修订，对问卷进行调整与扩容，以及变更年龄界定规则（采用调查基准时点年龄而非年末年龄）。与此同时，AKU的纳入年龄下限从16岁下调至15岁，上述调整导致上述领域的时间序列数据出现断点。