In heart failure reactivation of RNA-binding protein function results in expression of thousands of fetal-specific isoforms
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-13 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/In_heart_failure_reactivation_of_RNA-binding_protein_function_results_in_expression_of_thousands_of_fetal-specific_isoforms/13537343
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Table S3: Differential gene expression analysis
Shown is the differential expression analysis
between: iPSC-derived cardiovascular progenitor cells (iPSC-CVPC) and adult heart; iPSC-CVPC and adult arteria; adult heart
and adult arteria. For each gene, we report: gene ID; gene name; the tested
tissues (tissue 1 and tissue 2); effect size, standard error, p-value and FDR
correction (Bonferroni). Effect size > 0 corresponds to genes where the
expression in tissue 1 is greater than tissue 2.
Table S4: Functional enrichment analysis (genes)
The table shows the functional enrichment
analysis for genes differentially expressed between each pair of CVS tissues (Table S3). For each gene
set, we report: the tested tissues (tissue 1 and tissue 2); the gene set
collection, as defined by MSigDB, the gene set name and its URL; the number of
tested genes in the gene set; the average effect size for all the tested genes
in the gene set and for all the other expressed genes; p-value (t-test); and
FDR (Benjamini-Hochberg).
Table S5: Differential isoform expression analysis
Shown is the differential isoform expression
analysis between: iPSC-CVPC and adult heart; iPSC-CVPC and adult arteria; adult
heart and adult arteria. For each isoform, we report: isoform ID, gene ID, gene
name; the tested tissues (tissue 1 and tissue 2); effect size, standard error,
p-value and FDR correction (Bonferroni); mean isoform use in each of the two
tested tissues and the log2 ratio between them; whether the isoform
is differentially expressed (FDR < 0.05). Effect size > 0 corresponds to
isoforms where the expression in tissue 1 is greater than tissue 2.
Table S6: Functional enrichment analysis (isoforms)
The table shows the functional enrichment
analysis of genes that have at least one CVS tissue-specific isoform, compared
with genes that do not have differentially expressed isoforms between each pair
of CVS tissues (Table S5).
For each gene set, we report: the tested tissues (tissue 1 and tissue 2); the
gene set collection, as defined by MSigDB, the gene set name and its URL; the
number of tested genes in the gene set; the enrichment calculated using the estimate parameter in the fisher.test function in R; p-value
(Fisher’s exact test); and FDR (Benjamini-Hochberg).
Table S13: Differential gene expression analysis (cell types)
Shown are the associations between the
expression of each expressed gene and isoform and cell type proportions in all bulk
RNA-seq CVS samples. For each gene and isoform, we report: isoform ID, gene ID,
gene name; the cell type whose proportion is tested for association with
expression; effect size, standard error, p-value, FDR correction (Bonferroni);
whether the expression of the gene or isoform is associated with cell type
proportion (FDR < 0.05 and effect size > 0).
Table S14: Functional enrichment analysis (cell types)
The table shows the functional enrichment
analysis for genes associated with each cell type. The table is organized as Table S4, with a
difference: cell type, rather than “tissue 1” and “tissue 2” is reported. For
each cell type, we determined the association (effect size) between its
proportion and the expression of each gene, and used the effect sizes of all
expressed genes as input for gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). We observed
that the most significantly enriched gene sets corresponded to the main
function associated with each cell type, including mitochondrial and cell respiration
functions for cardiac muscle, immune response for immune cells, cytoskeleton
and actin binding for smooth muscle.
Table S15: Differential gene and isoform expression using cell type
proportions as covariates
Shown is the differential expression analysis
for both genes and isoforms performed using ridge regression and cell type
proportions as covariates between: iPSC-CVPC and adult heart; iPSC-CVPC and
adult arteria; adult heart and adult arteria. For each gene and isoform, we
report: isoform ID, gene ID and gene name; the tested tissues (tissue 1 and
tissue 2); the covariate, including “tissue”, which represents the differential
expression between tissue 1 and tissue 2, and each of the cell types; effect
size, standard error, p-value and FDR correction (Bonferroni).
Table S18: Differential expression between heart failure and healthy CVS
tissues
The table shows the results from differential
expression analysis of genes and isoforms between pre-LVAD samples and the
three healthy CVS tissues (iPSC-CVPC, adult heart and adult arteria). Columns
A-D show gene and transcript information, including: transcript ID, gene ID,
gene name, and analysis type (gene or isoform). Columns E-F show the pairs of tested
tissues. Columns G-J show the effect size, its standard error, p-value and FDR
correction (Bonferroni’s method). FDR correction was performed independently on
genes and isoforms.
创建时间:
2021-11-02



