Data supporting: 'Modelling and optimising hybrid process of wire arc additive manufacturing and high-pressure rolling'

Figure 7 Predicted distortion of the WAAM part after deactivation of clamps .<br> <br> Figure 8 Longitudinal RS distributions along the vertical path in the symmetry plane for the full-length mechanical models after clamps deactivation, compared to experimental measurements [5]. The flat roller (a) and slotted roller (b) were used in the rolling simulations, and the full-length model was based on the solution mapped from the steady-state region of the reduced-length WAAM + IL rolling model <br> <br> Figure 10 Concurrent evolution of temperature and longitudinal stress (a), as well as the longitudinal PS (b), in the layer 6 during WAAM deposition of layers 6-8 in conjunction with IL rolling using the flat roller. The data were collected at the top of layer 6 in the inspection plane and the rolling phases are highlighted in the yellow shaded areas.<br> <br> Figure 11 Concurrent evolution of temperature and longitudinal stress (a), as well as longitudinal PS (b), in the layer 6 during WAAM deposition of layers 9-11 in conjunction with IL rolling using the flat roller. The data were collected at the top of layer 6 in the inspection plane and the rolling phases are highlighted in the yellow shaded areas.<br> <br> Figure 12 Concurrent evolution of temperature and longitudinal stress (a), as well as longitudinal PS (b), in the layer 6 during WAAM deposition of layers 12-14 in conjunction with IL rolling using the flat roller. The data were collected at the top of layer 6 in the inspection plane and the rolling phases are highlighted in the yellow shaded areas.<br> <br> Figure 13 Concurrent evolution of the longitudinal PS and stress in the layer 9 during WAAM deposition of layers 9-16 in conjunction with IL rolling using the slotted roller. The data were collected at the top of layer 9 in the inspection plane (the slotted roller started rolling on layer 6) and the rolling phases are highlighted in the yellow shaded areas.<br> <br> Figure 18 Evolution of longitudinal PS in the layer 6 during WAAM deposition and stacked 4L rolling with flat roller. The rolling phases are highlighted in the yellow shaded areas.<br>

图7：卸除夹具后电弧增材制造（WAAM）构件的预测变形。<br><br>图8：卸除夹具后，全长力学模型在对称面内沿垂直路径的纵向残余应力（RS）分布，并与文献[5]中的实验测量结果对比。本次轧制模拟采用平辊(a)与槽纹辊(b)，且全长力学模型基于从缩减长度WAAM+在线轧制（IL rolling）模型的稳态区域映射得到的解。<br><br>图10：采用平辊开展在线轧制的同时，完成6-8层电弧增材沉积过程中，第6层内温度与纵向应力(a)以及纵向塑性应变(PS)(b)的协同演化规律。数据采集于检测平面内第6层的顶部，轧制阶段以黄色阴影区域标注。<br><br>图11：采用平辊开展在线轧制的同时，完成9-11层电弧增材沉积过程中，第6层内温度与纵向应力(a)以及纵向塑性应变(b)的协同演化规律。数据采集于检测平面内第6层的顶部，轧制阶段以黄色阴影区域标注。<br><br>图12：采用平辊开展在线轧制的同时，完成12-14层电弧增材沉积过程中，第6层内温度与纵向应力(a)以及纵向塑性应变(b)的协同演化规律。数据采集于检测平面内第6层的顶部，轧制阶段以黄色阴影区域标注。<br><br>图13：采用槽纹辊开展在线轧制的同时，完成9-16层电弧增材沉积过程中，第9层内纵向塑性应变与应力的协同演化规律。数据采集于检测平面内第9层的顶部（槽纹辊于第6层开始轧制），轧制阶段以黄色阴影区域标注。<br><br>图18：采用平辊开展四层堆叠在线轧制并伴随电弧增材沉积过程中，第6层内纵向塑性应变的演化规律。轧制阶段以黄色阴影区域标注。