Peer Support IDD Scoping Review Search

To identify studies to include or consider for this systematic review, the review team worked with a medical librarian to develop detailed search strategies for each database. The search was developed for PubMed (NLM) and was translated to ERIC (EbscoHost), PsycInfo (EbscoHost) and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) using a combination of keywords and subject headings. A grey literature search included NIRS, AAIDD, PaTTAN/PA, Think College UMASS, ILRU, Pacer.org and the PCORI websites. The search excluded child studies and was limited by date from 2005 to Present. The final search was completed on November 24, 2021. The full search details are provided in Appendix(___). PubMed (NLM) from 01/01/2005 to 11/24/2021 (858 Results) ERIC (EbscoHost) from 01/01/2005 to 11/24/2021 (288 Results) PsycInfo (EbscoHost) from 01/01/2005 to 11/24/2021 (279 Results) Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) from 01/01/2005 to 11/24/2021 (341 Results) The search resulted in 1,986 studies (210 from grey literature sources). 279 duplicate studies were found and omitted using Endnote 20 for the deduplication of records and 1,707 references were eligible to screen. Studies were screened by title and abstract by two blinded and independent reviewers. If a tiebreaker was needed, a third reviewer was called in. This process was repeated for full text article screening and article selection.

为确定本系统评价可纳入或考虑纳入的研究，评价团队与医学图书馆员合作，为各数据库制定了详尽的检索策略。本次检索以PubMed（NLM）的检索方案为基础，结合关键词与主题词，将其适配转化至ERIC（EbscoHost）、PsycInfo（EbscoHost）及Web of Science（科睿唯安，Clarivate Analytics）数据库。灰色文献检索覆盖NIRS、AAIDD、PaTTAN/PA、马萨诸塞大学Think College、ILRU、Pacer.org及PCORI官方网站。本检索排除儿童相关研究，时间范围限定为2005年至今，最终检索于2021年11月24日完成，完整检索细节详见附录(___)。各数据库检索结果如下：PubMed（NLM）2005年1月1日至2021年11月24日：858条结果；ERIC（EbscoHost）2005年1月1日至2021年11月24日：288条结果；PsycInfo（EbscoHost）2005年1月1日至2021年11月24日：279条结果；Web of Science（科睿唯安，Clarivate Analytics）2005年1月1日至2021年11月24日：341条结果。本次检索累计获取1986项研究，其中210项来自灰色文献源。通过EndNote 20进行文献去重，共剔除279项重复记录，最终得到1707篇可供筛选的参考文献。由两名盲法独立评审员通过标题与摘要开展初筛，若出现评审分歧，则引入第三名评审员进行裁决。全文文章筛选与文献遴选流程重复上述初筛步骤。