Additional file 3 of A novel estimator of between-study variance in random-effects models
收藏DataCite Commons2024-02-16 更新2024-07-28 收录
下载链接:
https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Additional_file_3_of_A_novel_estimator_of_between-study_variance_in_random-effects_models/11840451/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Additional file 3 Supplementary figures. Figure S1 Plot of the precision under the second hypothesis. Figure S2 Plot of the precision under the third hypothesis. Figure S3 Plot of the accuracy under the second hypothesis. Figure S4 Plot of the accuracy under the third hypothesis. Figure S5 Plot of the FPR under the second hypothesis. Figure S6 Plot of the FPR under the third hypothesis. Figure S7 Plot of the MCC under the second hypothesis. Figure S8 Plot of the MCC under the third hypothesis. Figure S9 Plot of the sensitivity under the second hypothesis. Figure S10 Plot of the sensitivity under the third hypothesis. Figure S11 Plot of the ROC curve and the AUC value under the second hypothesis. Figure S12 Plot of the ROC under the third hypothesis. The DSLD2 method is developed in this paper. Figure S13 Precision-recall plot under the second hypothesis. Figure S14 Precision-recall plot under the third hypothesis. Figure S15 Bias plot of 6 meta-analysis methods when τ2 is set to 1.0 and SMD is chosen as the effect size measure. Figure S16 RMSE plot of 6 meta-analysis methods when τ2 is set to 1.0 and SMD is chosen as the effect size measure. Figure S17 Bias plot of 6 meta-analysis methods when τ2 is set to 1.0 and MD is chosen as the effect size measure. Figure S18 RMSE plot of 6 meta-analysis methods when τ2 is set to 1.0 and MD is chosen as the effect size measure. Figure S19 Mean of I2 plot of 6 meta-analysis methods when τ2 is set to 1.0 and SMD is chosen as the effect size measure. Figure S20 Mean of I2 plot of 6 meta-analysis methods when τ2 is set to 1.0 and MD is chosen as the effect size measure.
附加文件3 补充附图。图S1 第二种假设下的精确率(Precision)绘图;图S2 第三种假设下的精确率绘图;图S3 第二种假设下的准确率(Accuracy)绘图;图S4 第三种假设下的准确率绘图;图S5 第二种假设下的假阳性率(False Positive Rate, FPR)绘图;图S6 第三种假设下的假阳性率绘图;图S7 第二种假设下的马修斯相关系数(Matthews Correlation Coefficient, MCC)绘图;图S8 第三种假设下的马修斯相关系数绘图;图S9 第二种假设下的灵敏度(Sensitivity)绘图;图S10 第三种假设下的灵敏度绘图;图S11 第二种假设下的受试者工作特征(Receiver Operating Characteristic, ROC)曲线及曲线下面积(Area Under Curve, AUC)值绘图;图S12 第三种假设下的ROC曲线绘图;本研究开发了DSLD2方法。图S13 第二种假设下的精确率-召回率曲线绘图;图S14 第三种假设下的精确率-召回率曲线绘图;图S15 当τ²设为1.0且选用标准化均数差(Standardized Mean Difference, SMD)作为效应量指标时,6种元分析方法的偏差绘图;图S16 当τ²设为1.0且选用标准化均数差作为效应量指标时,6种元分析方法的均方根误差(Root Mean Square Error, RMSE)绘图;图S17 当τ²设为1.0且选用均数差(Mean Difference, MD)作为效应量指标时,6种元分析方法的偏差绘图;图S18 当τ²设为1.0且选用均数差作为效应量指标时,6种元分析方法的均方根误差绘图;图S19 当τ²设为1.0且选用标准化均数差作为效应量指标时,6种元分析方法的I²统计量均值绘图;图S20 当τ²设为1.0且选用均数差作为效应量指标时,6种元分析方法的I²统计量均值绘图。
提供机构:
figshare
创建时间:
2020-02-12



