Comparisons between the Four HFD Tests of Intelligence for their Correlation with Wechsler or Stanford-Binet tests, Overall Hit Rate, and False Positive and False Negative Rates for Borderline and Superior Score Classifications.
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-07 收录
下载链接：
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Comparisons_between_the_Four_HFD_Tests_of_Intelligence_for_their_Correlation_with_Wechsler_or_Stanford_Binet_tests_Overall_Hit_Rate_and_False_Positive_and_False_Negative_Rates_for_Borderline_and_Superior_Score_Classifications_/667801
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务：
资源简介：
1Derived from Reisman and Yamokoski [26].
2Clinical population from Aikman et al. [29] in italics; overall hit rate, false + and – rates with visual-motor functioning partialed out.
3Derived from Willcock et al. [33]. The false + and – rates for superior intellectual functioning have not been previously published.
4*significant at p<0.01, **significant at p<0.001.
5Average: 90–119, Superior: >120.
6Borderline: <80, Low average: 80–89, Average: 90–110, High average: >110.
7Borderline: <80, Low average: 80–89, Average: 90–109, High average: 110–119, Superior: >120.
8False + and – rates based on scores >110 for the Aikman et al. [29] data with clinical population.
创建时间：
2013-03-14
