QSAR Leakage-Free Benchmark — EGFR pIC50 (ChEMBL v33)

Reproducible benchmark dataset and code for the manuscript: "Scaffold-Aware Evaluation Reveals Substantial Performance Inflation in EGFR pIC50 Benchmarks: A Reproducible Analysis on ChEMBL v33" Key finding: standard K-Fold cross-validation overestimates R² by +93% on 10,113 EGFR inhibitors from ChEMBL v33 (R² = 0.679 vs 0.352 under scaffold-honest evaluation). Despite low absolute R², the scaffold-honest ensemble achieves Concordance Index = 0.728 and Enrichment Factor@5% = 7.78×, confirming practical utility for virtual screening on novel scaffolds. Contents:- paper/ — full manuscript PDF (preprint v2)- data/ — 10,113 EGFR compounds with pre-defined scaffold splits, scaffold summary, machine-readable benchmark results JSON- figures/ — 6 publication-ready figures (300 dpi)- code/ — reproducible Jupyter notebook (ChEMBL download to final results in one execution)- README.md — complete documentation The Leakage Ladder framework defines four progressively stricter evaluation levels:L1 — Random K-Fold (standard practice, R² = 0.679)L2 — Multi-Seed OOF (claimed honest, R² = 0.703)L3 — Scaffold Split single model (R² = 0.315)L4 — Final ensemble on scaffold test (R² = 0.352, CI = 0.728) All results are reproducible from the included notebook (1-click on Kaggle with GPU). Companion preprint on ChemRxiv: DOI 10.26434/chemrxiv.15001489Author's research page: actaruslab.org