Map visualisation service (WMS) of the dataset: New Aquitaine partial: Classified Environmental Protection Facilities (ICPE) subject to disclosure (PAC) — Location (one-off)

This dataset contains the location of Classified Facilities for the Protection of the Environment (ICPE) (one-off) subject to a report (PAC) in New Aquitaine. ATTENTION: this dataset is not complete on the Nouvelle-Aquitaine perimeter, it concerns the former Poitou-Charentes region. The hazard studies of certain installations classified for the protection of the environment show that the distances of effects (calculated according to the effect thresholds fixed by the Decree of 29 September 2005) of accidents likely to occur within the premises of these establishments may exceed where necessary outside the limits of ownership of the industries concerned. It is therefore necessary to control future urbanisation in a graduated manner around these sites to limit the risk exposure of riparian populations. The regulations provide for several types of approach functions of the administrative status of the industries causing these ranges of effects: — for high-threshold SEVESO establishments (classified below the AS threshold of the classification of classified facilities), it is appropriate to prescribe Public Utility Servitudes (SUPs) which are enforceable against third parties. — for older SEVESO establishments, the regulations provide for the enactment of Technological Risk Prevention Plans (PPRTs) which are also enforceable against third parties but which take into account, unlike SUPs, urban planning already in place. For other undertakings falling, in particular, under the threshold of simple authorisation or of the SEVESO low threshold of the classification of classified installations, the circular of 4 May 2007 provides for bringing to the attention (PAC) of the town halls the extent of the hazard zones determined by the calculation of the effects distances indicated above. The circular of 4 May 2007 also provides for a proposal for town halls to manage urban planning within these areas in proportion to their level of danger. On the other hand, specific sectoral texts call for certain industries to be, at the time of their establishment, distant from third parties and that this remoteness be maintained over time. This is particularly the case with cereal storage silos very present in Poitou-Charentes. In the end, bringing them to light may be the superposition, for a given site, of urban planning constraints enacted according to the circular of 4 May 2007 but also of the decree of 29 March 2004 on silos.本数据集涵盖新阿基坦大区内需按通报报告（PAC）要求上报的一次性环境保护分类设施（Installations Classées pour la Protection de l'Environnement，ICPE）的位置信息。 注意：本数据集在新阿基坦大区全域范围内并不完整，仅覆盖原普瓦图-夏朗德大区范围。 部分环境保护分类设施的风险评估研究显示，依据2005年9月29日政令规定的影响阈值计算得出的事故影响距离，在必要情况下可能超出相关企业的权属边界。因此需对这些场地周边的未来城市化进程实施分级管控，以降低周边居民的风险暴露水平。 针对产生此类影响范围的企业，法规依据其行政属性划分了多种管控路径： ——针对高阈值塞韦索（SEVESO）设施（归类于环境保护分类设施的AS阈值以下范畴），应设立可对第三方强制执行的公共役权（Servitudes d'Utilité Publique，SUPs）。 ——针对老旧塞韦索（SEVESO）设施，法规要求制定技术风险预防计划（Plan de Prévention des Risques Technologiques，PPRTs），该计划同样可对第三方强制执行，但与公共役权不同的是，其会兼顾已有的城市规划布局。 对于其他尤其归类于简易许可阈值或环境保护分类设施低阈值塞韦索范畴的企业，2007年5月4日的通告要求将上述通过影响距离计算得出的危险区域范围告知市政厅（PAC）。 2007年5月4日的通告同时提出，建议市政厅根据这些区域的危险等级，按比例管控该范围内的城市规划活动。 此外，特定行业法规要求部分企业在设立时需与第三方保持安全距离，并确保该距离在后续运营中持续维持。普瓦图-夏朗德大区分布广泛的谷物储粮仓筒便属于此类情况。 最终，针对某一特定场地，其需同时遵守2007年5月4日通告所规定的城市规划约束，以及2004年3月29日发布的粮筒仓专项政令的相关要求，两类约束存在叠加效应。