Research Data _ PPA.xlsx

This article makes a theoretical contribution to the fields of public policy and administration by systematically analyzing the intersection of crisis management and public administration. It develops an evidence-based theoretical framework to guide future research and practice. The study synthesizes a vast body of literature, organizing and assessing how crisis management and public administration have been studied over the decades. Drawing on a detailed analysis of 877 articles from a pool of 16,203, sourced from Web of Science and Scopus, the article employs both manual and automated coding methods. The analysis traces scholarly discussions on crisis management in public administration back to 1972, with a significant rise in publications from 2019 to 2023, largely driven by research on the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase in COVID-19-related research has overshadowed other pressing crises such as refugee movements, mass displacement, terrorism, and climate change. Additionally, the review highlights a geographic imbalance, with over 80% of studies originating from Western countries, limiting the diversity of perspectives on global crises. In response, the article proposes a research agenda that emphasizes the importance of public administration in addressing emerging global challenges. It proposes a proactive, rather than reactive, approach and calls for greater integration of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence, into public governance.<br>

本文通过系统分析危机管理与公共行政的交叉领域，为公共政策与公共行政领域作出了理论贡献。本文构建了循证理论框架，用以指导后续的研究与实践工作。本研究整合了海量学术文献，梳理并评析数十年来学界围绕危机管理与公共行政展开的研究脉络。本研究从Web of Science与Scopus数据库收录的16203篇文献中筛选出877篇开展详尽分析，同时采用人工编码与自动化编码两种分析方法。分析结果表明，学界关于公共行政领域危机管理的学术讨论最早可追溯至1972年；2019至2023年相关文献发表量显著攀升，这一增长主要由新冠疫情（COVID-19 pandemic）相关研究驱动。但此类新冠疫情相关研究的爆发式增长，却掩盖了难民迁徙、大规模流离失所、恐怖主义与气候变化等其他亟待应对的全球性危机议题。此外，本综述还揭示了研究的地理分布失衡问题：超过80%的研究成果来自西方国家，这极大限制了全球危机研究视角的多元性。针对上述局限，本文提出了一项研究议程，着重强调公共行政在应对新兴全球挑战中的关键作用。本文倡导采用前瞻性而非被动应对的治理路径，并呼吁将人工智能（artificial intelligence）等先进技术更深入地融入公共治理体系。