Labour Force Survey 1995, 4th quarter

Labour Force Survey 1995 - 4th quarter

As of the 1st quarter of 1972, SSB has conducted official quarterly labour force surveys (AKU). These surveys aim to give the labour force authorities (and other people interested) knowledge of the occupational structure of the population and how it develops over time. The surveys are meant to give a foundation and statistical material for occupational prognoses and labour research. The samples in AKU are from 1992 representative at county level. In the period 1972-1991 they were representative on county pair level.

Originally, AKU respondents were interviewed in two consecutive quarters of a year, followed by a pause of two quarters, and then another two quarters of interviews. The sample was approximately 10-11.000 respondents in each quarter up until 1988. Originally, AKU was intended to be an analytical supplement to the monthly occupational statistics that was based on the social security membership index file. However, the social security-based statistics disappeared when the sickness benefit was included in the National Insurance as of 1st of January 1971, and AKU has after gradually developed into the most significant source of knowledge of the state of the labour market and its development.

In 1975, Statistics Norway changed the sampling frame of survey research, see article 37: “Om bruk av stikkprøver ved kontoret for intervjuundersøkelser”, SSB (About the Use of Random Samples at the Office for Survey Research, Statistics Norway) by Steinar Tamsfoss, and SØS 33: “Prinsipper og metoder for Statistisk sentralbyrås utvalgsundersøkelse (Principles and Methods for Statistics Norway's sample research) by Ib Thomsen. Simultaneously, the method for estimation of inflation to national numbers was changed, so that reasonable numbers for regions do exist from 1975 and onwards. The change in 1975 led to a different way of interviewing in groups. This caused amongst other things a break with the AKU panel systematics.

In the AKU survey of 1976, a slightly changed questionnaire was introduced. Also, there was a return to the original 6-quarter rotation scheme. The new questionnaire implied a better identification of family workers and persons that are temporarily without paid work. Thus, 30-35 000 more people were defined as employed. The group of "job-seekers without income" were also extended to include persons that were on an involuntary leave of absence. The questions concerning underemployment and “over employment” in the original questionnaire were abandoned.

From the 1st quarter of 1987, the estimation method (inflation to national numbers) was slightly changed. There was also a minor adjustment in the definition of employment. In order to ensure that the numbers were to be comparable to earlier surveys, new versions of the 1980-1986 AKU-files were drawn up. Consequently two versions of the 1980-1987 files - respectively with the old and new methods of estimation - exist. The “old” means that the data are comparable to the original numbers published in the period of 1972 - 1987, whilst the “new” implies that the data are comparable to numbers published after 1987.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Between the 1st and 2nd quarter of 1988, the AKU file description was changed. The variable “Labour-market status” was given a different coding. In addition, adjustments in the data collections were made - from interviewing a specific week every quarter to carry out continuous weekly interviews. SSB also started up an escalation scheme to increase the sample size. This affected the weights, and from the 2nd quarter of 1988, these were recalculated monthly. To balance out the quarterly or yearly files to total national numbers, the monthly weights therefore had to be divided in three or twelve to give the correct total number.

In 1996, AKU was significantly revised: The questionnaire, the file description and the standard for coding of industry and occupation. The data collection also changed to CATI - Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing. A new classification of industry was put into use (NOS C 182, based on the EU standard NACE, Rev.1). This standard was updated in 2002 and 2007. Also, the new occupational classification (STYRK) based on ISCO 88 was used from 1996 and onwards. The variable indicating socio-economic status was omitted, as a similar variable was not developed in the new occupational classification.

As from January 2006 some major changes were introduced to AKU in order to enhance its comparability to similar surveys in other countries. The changes consist of minor definitional adjustments of unemployment, some adjustments and enlargement of the questionnaire and a change in age definition (age at reference point instead of at the end of the year). Simultaneously the lower age limit to be included in AKU was lowered from 16 to 15 years. This led to some breaks in the time series in the mentioned areas.

1995年第四季度劳动力调查（Labour Force Survey）

自1972年第一季度起，挪威统计总局（Statistics Norway, SSB）便开展官方季度劳动力调查（AKU）。此类调查旨在为劳动力管理部门及其他相关方提供人口职业结构及其随时间演变的相关信息，同时为职业预测与劳动力研究提供基础依据与统计素材。1992年起，AKU的抽样样本实现县级代表性；1972年至1991年期间，样本则在配对郡级上具有代表性。

最初，AKU的受访者需在一年中的两个连续季度接受访谈，随后暂停两个季度，再进行新一轮两个季度的访谈。1988年之前，每季度的受访样本量约为10000至11000人。AKU最初旨在作为基于社会保障参保索引档案的月度职业统计的分析补充，但1971年1月1日病假津贴纳入国民保险体系后，基于社会保障的统计数据不复存在，AKU也逐步发展为了解劳动力市场现状及其发展态势的核心信息来源。

1975年，挪威统计总局修订了调查研究的抽样框，相关细节可参见Steinar Tamsfoss撰写的《关于调查研究办公室的随机抽样使用规范》（原文："Om bruk av stikkprøver ved kontoret for intervjuundersøkelser", SSB）以及Ib Thomsen撰写的《挪威统计总局抽样调查的原则与方法》（原文："Prinsipper og metoder for Statistisk sentralbyrås utvalgsundersøkelse"）。同年，将样本数据推算为全国总量的估算方法也进行了调整，自此1975年起可生成合理的区域层面统计数据。1975年的修订还改变了分组访谈的方式，这一变动打破了AKU原有的面板轮换机制。

1976年的AKU调查中，问卷进行了小幅修订，同时恢复了最初的6季度轮换机制。新问卷能够更好地识别家庭用工从业者与临时无薪工作者，因此被界定为就业者的人数增加了3万至3.5万人。“无收入求职者”群体的范围也扩展至非自愿休假人员，原问卷中关于就业不足与过度就业的问题则被移除。

1987年第一季度起，全国总量推算方法进行了小幅调整，就业定义也进行了微调。为确保数据与此前调查具有可比性，研究人员编制了1980年至1986年AKU数据文件的两个版本，分别采用新旧两种估算方法。因此1980年至1987年的AKU数据存在两个版本：“旧版本”的数据与1972年至1987年发布的原始数据可比，“新版本”的数据则与1987年之后发布的数据可比。

1988年第一季度与第二季度之间，AKU的文件说明进行了调整：“劳动力市场状态”变量的编码方式发生变更，同时数据收集流程也进行了优化——从每季度固定一周访谈改为连续每周访谈。挪威统计总局还启动了样本扩容方案，这对抽样权重计算产生了影响，自1988年第二季度起，权重改为每月重新计算。为了将季度或年度数据校准至全国总量，月度抽样权重需分别除以3或12以得到正确的总样本量。

1996年，AKU进行了大幅修订，涵盖问卷、文件说明以及行业与职业编码标准。数据收集方式改为计算机辅助电话调查（Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing, CATI），并启用了基于欧盟NACE Rev.1标准的新行业分类标准（NOS C 182），该标准分别于2002年与2007年进行了更新。1996年起，新的职业分类标准（STYRK）开始投入使用，该标准基于国际职业分类标准第8版（International Standard Classification of Occupations 1988, ISCO 88）。由于新职业分类中未设置类似变量，原有的社会经济地位变量被移除。

2006年1月起，AKU进行了多项重大调整，以提升与其他国家同类调查的可比性。调整内容包括对失业定义的小幅修订、问卷的优化与扩容，以及年龄定义的变更——将原有的年末年龄改为调查时点年龄。同时，AKU的最低受访年龄从16岁降至15岁，这导致上述领域的时间序列出现断点。