时控继电器专利价值分析数据

时控继电器高价值专利数据，采集自公司自建专题数据库的发明专利和实用新型数据，对专利数据进行人工标引、评价打分、综合量化。有助于领域内的创新主体快速获得该领域内的高价值专利信息，加快对时控继电器领域核心技术检索效率，同时基于检索结果，企业可以结合专利具体信息深入分析，例如：按年份申请量分析发展趋势、按专利综合价值分析技术创新能力或水平差异，引导企业自身研发方向，避免重复研发及专利纠纷产生。数据基于AHP层次分析法，采用定量与定性相结合的分析方法，从专利价值度法出发，将专利价值指标体系分为技术价值、法律价值、经济价值3项指标； 技术价值指标由专利类型、同族专利数、引证数、技术先进性、技术可替代性等进行归一化处理得到，发明专利得分高于实用新型，同族、引证数越多分数越高，技术先进性、技术可替代性等由领域内技术人员进行评价打分，技术先进性越高分数越高，技术可替代性越低，分数越高； 法律价值指标由独立权利要求数量、权项数、专利稳定性、专利可规避性等进行归一化处理得到，独立权利要求数量、权项数越多分数越高，专利稳定性、专利可规避性由公司专利工程师进行人工评估打分，专利稳定性越强分数越高，专利可替代性越低分数越高； 经济价值指标由转让、许可、质押融资、市场规模等进行归一化处理得到，转让、许可、质押融资次数越多，金额越高，分数越高，市场规模由公司市场人员进行评估打分，规模越大分数越高； 根据以上指标建立3个维度的矩阵，分别利用层次分析法进行量化评估，得到综合评分，满分100分；最后，采用公式专利综合价值＝α×技术价值＋β×法律价值＋γ×经济价值，α，β，γ为权重，且α＝0.5，β=0.3，γ=0.2，据此所计算的专利综合价值越高代表专利的价值就越高，专利综合价值大于60为高价值专利。

High-value patent data for time-controlled relays, collected from invention patents and utility model patents in the company's self-built specialized database. The patent data undergoes manual indexing, evaluation scoring, and comprehensive quantification. This dataset helps innovation entities in the field quickly obtain high-value patent information within this domain, and accelerates the efficiency of core technology retrieval in the time-controlled relays sector. Meanwhile, based on the retrieval results, enterprises can conduct in-depth analysis combined with specific patent information, such as analyzing development trends by annual application volume, and evaluating differences in technological innovation capabilities or levels based on the comprehensive patent value. This helps guide enterprises' own R&D directions and avoid redundant R&D and patent disputes.

The dataset is built based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), adopting a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis methods. Starting from the patent valuation methodology, the patent value indicator system is divided into three indicators: technological value, legal value, and economic value.
The technological value indicator is obtained through normalization processing based on patent type, number of patent families, number of citations, technological advancement, technological substitutability, etc. Invention patents score higher than utility models; the more patent families and citations there are, the higher the score. Technological advancement and technological substitutability are evaluated and scored by technical personnel in the field: the higher the technological advancement, the higher the score; the lower the technological substitutability, the higher the score.
The legal value indicator is obtained through normalization processing based on the number of independent claims, number of claim items, patent stability, patent avoidability, etc. The more the number of independent claims and claim items, the higher the score. Patent stability and patent avoidability are manually evaluated and scored by the company's patent engineers: the stronger the patent stability, the higher the score; the lower the patent substitutability, the higher the score.
The economic value indicator is obtained through normalization processing based on transfers, licenses, pledge financing, market size, etc. The more times of transfers, licenses, and pledge financing, and the higher the corresponding amounts, the higher the score. Market size is evaluated and scored by the company's marketing personnel: the larger the market size, the higher the score.
A three-dimensional matrix is established based on the above indicators, and quantitative evaluation is carried out using the Analytic Hierarchy Process respectively to obtain a comprehensive score with a full score of 100. Finally, the formula Comprehensive Patent Value = α×Technological Value + β×Legal Value + γ×Economic Value is adopted, where α, β, γ are weights, with α=0.5, β=0.3, γ=0.2. The higher the calculated comprehensive patent value, the higher the value of the patent. Patents with a comprehensive patent value greater than 60 are classified as high-value patents.

搜集汇总

背景与挑战

背景概述

该数据集为浙江正泰电器股份有限公司提供的时控继电器专利价值分析数据，包含818条记录，每年更新。数据详细记录了专利的各项信息，并通过技术、法律和经济三个维度对专利价值进行量化评估，旨在帮助创新主体高效获取高价值专利信息，指导研发方向。