five

New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer

收藏
DataCite Commons2022-06-02 更新2024-07-29 收录
下载链接:
https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/New_criteria_for_breast_symmetry_evaluation_after_breast_conserving_surgery_for_cancer/19961982
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate symmetry after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer. Methods: a prospective study of patients undergoing BCS. These patients were photographed using the same criteria of evaluation. The references points used were the nipple height difference (NH), the nipple-manubrium distances (NM), nipple-sternum distances (NS) and the angle between the intramammary fold and the nipple (nipple angle; NA). ImageJ software was used. Three breast symmetry models were evaluated: excellent/others (model 1), excellent-good/others (model 2) and others/poor (model 3). The ROC curve was used to select acceptable criteria for the evaluation of symmetry. Decision tree model analysis was performed. Results: a total of 274 women were evaluated. The BCCT.core result was excellent in 5.8% (16), good in 24.1% (66), fair in 46.4% (127) and poor in 23.7% (65). The difference in NH was associated with good breast area (0.837-0.846); acceptable differences were below 3.1 cm, while unacceptable values were greater than 6.4 cm. Differences in the NM were associated with average breast area (0.709-0.789); a difference in value of less than 4.5 cm was acceptable, while values greater than 6.3 cm were unacceptable. In the decision tree combined model, a good-excellent outcome for patients with differential (d) dNH = 1 (0 to 5.30 cm) and dNM ≠ 3 (<6.28 cm); and for a poor/poor result, values dNM = 3 (> 6.35). Conclusions: the results presented here are simple tools that can assist the surgeon for breast symmetry evaluation.

摘要 目的:评估癌症患者接受保乳手术(breast-conserving surgery, BCS)后的乳房对称性情况。方法:本研究为一项针对接受保乳手术患者的前瞻性研究。所有患者均采用统一评估标准进行拍照。本次研究选取的参考指标包括:乳头高度差(nipple height difference, NH)、乳头-胸骨柄间距(nipple-manubrium distance, NM)、乳头-胸骨间距(nipple-sternum distance, NS)以及乳腺内褶皱与乳头间夹角(乳头夹角,nipple angle, NA)。研究采用ImageJ软件(ImageJ)进行数据分析,并对三种乳房对称性评估模型展开评估:模型1(优/其他)、模型2(优-良/其他)以及模型3(其他/差)。本研究采用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve, ROC)筛选适用于对称性评估的合格判定标准,并开展决策树模型分析。结果:本研究共纳入274名女性患者完成评估。经BCCT.core工具评估,结果为优者占5.8%(16例),良者占24.1%(66例),一般者占46.4%(127例),差者占23.7%(65例)。乳头高度差与乳房区域良好评分呈显著相关(相关系数区间为0.837~0.846),可接受的差值范围为≤3.1 cm,差值>6.4 cm则判定为不合格。乳头-胸骨柄间距差值与乳房平均区域评分呈显著相关(相关系数区间为0.709~0.789),差值<4.5 cm为可接受范围,差值>6.3 cm则判定为不合格。在联合决策树模型中,当差值dNH=1(0~5.30 cm)且dNM≠3(<6.28 cm)时,患者预后为优-良等级;而当dNM=3(>6.35 cm)时,患者预后为差-差等级。结论:本研究所得结果为简便易用的评估工具,可辅助外科医师完成乳房对称性评估。
提供机构:
SciELO journals
创建时间:
2022-06-02
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务