PET-Health/GraduaSUS in the perspective of service and teaching actors: contributions, limits, and suggestions
收藏DataCite Commons2021-03-23 更新2024-07-27 收录
下载链接:
https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/PET-Health_GraduaSUS_in_the_perspective_of_service_and_teaching_actors_contributions_limits_and_suggestions/9870590
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
ABSTRACT This manuscript presents the results of an online survey conducted with the project and group coordinators of the last edition of the Education through Work for Health Program (PET-Health/GraduaSUS), which sought to identify the results achieved and to point out the limits and contributions of such edition for the production of changes. The survey was carried out in March and April 2018, with 445 coordinators, whose quantitative data were treated statistically; and qualitative data by content analysis, giving rise to four categories: The positive repercussions of PET-Health/GraduaSUS; The negative aspects of PET-Health/GraduaSUS; The coordination of the projects by the health service: controversial point; and Suggestions for changes. It was found that the PET-Health/GraduaSUS contributed to the professional development, expansion and diversification of the learning scenarios, strengthening primary care and interprofessional education in the curricula and benefited the local community. The main positive aspects of the edition were the coordination of the project by the health service and the reports of experiences in the Community of Practices; the numerical and uniprofessional composition of the groups, however, was pointed as a negative aspect.
摘要 本文呈现了面向上一届以工作促健康教育项目(Education through Work for Health Program,PET-Health/GraduaSUS)的项目及小组协调员开展的线上调查结果。本调查旨在梳理该届项目的已达成成果,并明确其对推动变革的局限与贡献。本次调查于2018年3月至4月间开展,共回收445名协调员的有效反馈。其中,定量数据采用统计学方法进行分析,定性数据则通过内容分析法开展编码与提炼,最终归纳为四大研究类别:PET-Health/GraduaSUS的积极影响、该项目的不足之处、医疗服务机构主导项目协调这一争议性议题,以及优化变革建议。研究发现,PET-Health/GraduaSUS助力参与者的专业能力发展,拓展并丰富了学习场景,强化了课程体系中的基层医疗与跨专业教育内容,同时惠及当地社区。该届项目的核心积极亮点包括医疗服务机构主导的项目协调机制,以及实践社区中的经验分享报告;而项目小组的人员规模与单一专业背景构成,则被指出为本次项目的主要短板。
提供机构:
SciELO journals
创建时间:
2019-09-18



